Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620
68 Imaging
65 Features
81 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff2cb/ff2cb286ed615c862ef3fc8077b4d0097dac0019" alt="Nikon D5300 front Nikon D5300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84398/84398a61fc4b5fc986153c91985e0198eeea7a6c" alt="Olympus E-620 front Olympus E-620 front"
71 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 480g - 125 x 98 x 76mm
- Released February 2014
- Replaced the Nikon D5200
- Successor is Nikon D5500
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 500g - 130 x 94 x 60mm
- Launched July 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Nikon D5300 versus Olympus E-620, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the D5300 (24MP) and E-620 (12MP) and the D5300 (APS-C) and E-620 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The D5300 was released 4 years later than the E-620 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the D5300 scores vs the E-620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon D5300 & Olympus E-620. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon D5300 Gallery & Olympus E-620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D5300 over the Olympus E-620
D5300 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | Fresher by 57 months |
Screen dimensions | 3.2" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-620 over the Nikon D5300
E-620 | D5300 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon D5300 and Olympus E-620
D5300 | E-620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Nikon D5300 has got physical dimensions of 125mm x 98mm x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") with a weight of 480 grams (1.06 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-620 has specifications of 130mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") and a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
See the Nikon D5300 versus Olympus E-620 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the D5300 compared to the E-620.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03c73/03c7301921b08d9dafa53860588d942932559d73" alt="Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620 size comparison Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the D5300 and E-620 is 68 and 71 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9c3a/d9c3a97c02af83d840d1a6e245659e63095f31d8" alt="Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620 top view buttons comparison Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620 top view buttons comparison"
Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by researching technical specs. The photograph below might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the D5300 and E-620.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The D5300 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Nikon D5300 will result in extra detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures more aggressively. The younger D5300 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7f7e/a7f7ef1497173a215b3bfe3141f8557232efc618" alt="Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620 sensor size comparison Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620 sensor size comparison"
Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71ab9/71ab95b5c8c9c1a7fca9e91c04980f840deadcd1" alt="Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Nikon D5300 vs Olympus E-620 Specifications
Nikon D5300 | Olympus E-620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon D5300 | Olympus E-620 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2014-02-12 | 2009-07-06 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Expeed 4 | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 39 | 7 |
Cross type focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Nikon F | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 309 | 45 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3.2" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD monitor | HyperCrystal LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.55x | 0.48x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, Rear curtain | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Front curtain, Rear curtain, Fill-in, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/200s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 480 gr (1.06 lbs) | 500 gr (1.10 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 98 x 76mm (4.9" x 3.9" x 3.0") | 130 x 94 x 60mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 83 | 55 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | 21.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.9 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 1338 | 536 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 600 pictures | 500 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL14,EN-EL14a | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $429 | $799 |