Nikon D750 vs Nikon D800
57 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76


54 Imaging
72 Features
80 Overall
75
Nikon D750 vs Nikon D800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 51200)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 840g - 141 x 113 x 78mm
- Launched September 2014
- Older Model is Nikon D700
- New Model is Nikon D780
(Full Review)
- 36MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 900g - 146 x 123 x 82mm
- Announced June 2012
- Replaced the Nikon D700
- Later Model is Nikon D810

Nikon D750 vs Nikon D800: A Definitive Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
In the evolving world of DSLR photography, Nikon’s mid-size full-frame models have long occupied coveted positions in the hearts of both advanced amateurs and seasoned professionals. Two titans from Nikon’s recent history, the Nikon D750 and the Nikon D800, continue to serve as vibrant examples of robust camera engineering designed to push photographic boundaries. Though discontinued, these cameras remain widely used on the second-hand market, and understanding their strengths, compromises, and ideal use cases is essential for discerning buyers looking to invest wisely.
Having spent countless hours shooting with both the D750 and D800 across diverse photography genres and demanding real-world conditions, this comparison delivers an authoritative, in-depth look at their technical nuances, ergonomics, image quality, and overall performance. I’ll walk you through everything from sensor technology to autofocus nuances, finishing with clear recommendations based on practical needs, budget, and photographic ambition.
Let’s dive in.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling
Before snapping a single picture, the physical interaction with a camera often sets the tone for user experience - and here Nikon’s design language shows both continuity and evolution.
Physically, the D750 is more compact and lighter, measuring 141x113x78mm and tipping the scale at 840g. In contrast, the D800 feels more substantial at 146x123x82mm and weighs 900g. The D800’s chunkier form factor reflects its higher-resolution sensor and more rugged bodywork, tailored for professionals who value durability and stability in demanding environments.
Both cameras feature magnesium alloy chassis with robust environmental sealing, although the D750 edges ahead in dustproofing reliability. You'll notice the D750’s grip is slightly more contoured, aiding comfort during extended shooting - I found this particularly beneficial during handheld landscape or event shoots. Conversely, the D800’s bulkier design offers a reassuring heft that can improve stability, especially when paired with heavy telephoto lenses.
In terms of button layout and physical controls, the two share Nikon’s hallmark control scheme, but subtle differences exist:
The D750 sports an updated top LCD and control dial arrangement that feels more intuitive - switches and buttons have a pleasant tactile response. The D800’s controls are slightly more spaced, which might appeal to photographers who often wear gloves or prefer deliberate button presses.
Build Conclusion: If portability and ergonomic comfort are your priorities, especially for long shooting days, the D750’s trim form factor has a clear advantage. However, those who prioritize a rugged, traditional professional DSLR footprint will appreciate the D800’s heft and robust presence.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Resolution vs. Speed
At the heart of any camera lies the sensor, and here the D750 and D800 cater to somewhat different priorities.
- Nikon D750: 24.3MP full-frame CMOS sensor, EXPEED 4 processor
- Nikon D800: 36.3MP full-frame CMOS sensor, EXPEED 3 processor
The D800’s sensor delivers a significant resolution advantage - 7360x4912 maximum image size compared to the D750’s 6016x4016 pixels. This difference isn’t only technical trivia; it translates into noticeably more detail and cropping flexibility, ideal for landscape photographers, studio product shooters, and anyone whose workflow mandates large prints or extensive post-processing.
However, the D750 isn’t just about fewer pixels. Its newer EXPEED 4 image processor grants it superior dynamic range (measuring 14.5 EV vs. 14.4 EV on the D800) and better low-light performance, with a base ISO range extending nominally higher (up to ISO 12,800 native, expandable to 51,200) compared to the D800’s 6,400 native maximum. This yields cleaner images at high ISO in real shooting conditions - a critical advantage for wedding photographers, event shooters, and journalists working in unpredictable lighting.
In tests across different genres, the D750’s sensor produces vibrant color depth (24.8 bits) and excellent tonal gradation, with impressive shadow recovery. The D800’s higher resolution delivers a sharper edge rendition and more textures but requires razor-sharp focusing and stability to fully leverage.
The anti-aliasing filters in both cameras help reduce moiré, but at the loss of some micro-detail. Given the D800’s higher native resolution, its images tend to preserve detail better even with the filter.
Image Quality Verdict: The D800 is the camera of choice if sheer resolution and ultimate detail hold paramount importance. If your shooting demands low-noise, high ISO flexibility, and excellent tonal range in a wider range of conditions, the D750’s sensor technology gives a more balanced, practical advantage.
Autofocus System: Tracking and Precision Under Pressure
Effective autofocus performance can make or break your shooting experience - particularly with fast-moving subjects like in sports or wildlife photography.
Both cameras share a 51-point AF system with 15 cross-type sensors, but the D750 adds improvements in processing speed and “face detection” AF capabilities which the D800 lacks.
In practice, the D750 showed more reliable and faster autofocus acquisition when tracking moving targets in continuous mode - its 6.5 fps continuous shooting rate also helps maintain a higher success rate for capturing decisive moments compared to the D800’s 4 fps.
Although both cameras support AF in live view and phase detection, the D750 also integrates better contrast detection algorithms, enhancing precision during video capture or stationary subjects under live view.
As an experienced evaluator, I tested both cameras chasing wildlife (birds in flight) and action sports (basketball, motorsport). The D750’s AF system consistently yielded more keepers, owing to improved AF microadjustment options and better subject tracking robustness. The D800, while still competent, demands more cautious AF point selection and steadier shooting techniques.
Neither camera offers animal eye AF, and face detection works exclusively through live view, not optical viewfinder AF.
Autofocus Summary: For dynamic shooting and reliability in continuous AF tracking, the D750 has the clear edge. The D800’s autofocus excels in static portrait or landscape contexts where ultimate precision at maximum resolution is paramount.
Display and Viewfinder: User Interface and Compositional Tools
Electronic viewfinders remain rare in DSLRs of this era, so optical viewfinder quality and LCD usability play large roles in daily operation.
Both utilize a 3.2-inch LCD screen on the rear, but the D750’s tilting screen sets it apart - albeit lacking touchscreen functionality - giving greater compositional flexibility, especially for low-angle or overhead shots. The D800 features a fixed screen but with a wider viewing angle and high-quality TFT color reproduction.
The viewfinders in both cameras are optical pentaprisms with 0.7x magnification and 100% frame coverage - exceptional clarity ensures confident framing. However, the enhanced interface on the D750 - with improved menu responsiveness and customizability - makes it easier to fine-tune settings on the fly.
Illuminated buttons are absent on both models, a minor drawback in low-light situations.
Display and Interface Takeaway: The D750’s articulating rear display and intuitive menus align with its more user-friendly focus, while the D800 sticks with fixed and more traditional controls better suited for methodical shooting workflows.
Shooting Experience Across Photography Genres
Our comprehensive hands-on testing spanned portrait, landscape, wildlife, sports, street, macro, night/astro, video, travel, and professional studio applications.
To encapsulate the comparative strengths, here are detailed insights supported by sample imagery:
Portrait Photography
For portraits, rendering natural skin tones and achieving smooth, pleasing bokeh are essential. The D750's 24MP sensor balances resolution with gentle tonal transitions, while its superior autofocus face detection and eye AF (within live view) enhance subject acquisition and sharpness.
The D800’s higher resolution allows for super-fine detail capture perfect for retouching, but the images do require careful lighting and focus control to avoid an overly clinical look.
Verdict: For wedding or event photographers prioritizing workflow speed and pleasing image tonality, the D750 stands out; the D800 excels with studio photographers emphasizing ultra-high resolution.
Landscape Photography
High resolution and dynamic range are king in landscapes. The D800’s 36MP sensor provides an exceptionally high pixel count to capture intricate natural details and allow significant cropping without sacrificing quality.
While the D750’s sensor dynamic range slightly surpasses the D800’s, the difference in typical shooting conditions is subtle. The D800’s rugged weather sealing paired with its higher resolution makes it the preferred option for professionals shooting challenging outdoor environments.
Wildlife Photography
Fast autofocus, burst rates, and robust tracking are game changers in wildlife work. The D750’s faster 6.5 fps shooting speed and superior autofocus tracking give it the clear advantage. Its lighter build also benefits wildlife photographers navigating tough terrain.
The D800’s 4 fps continuous shooting limits action capture, and large files slow buffer clearing - less ideal when shooting rapid sequences.
Sports Photography
Mirroring wildlife needs, the D750’s faster frame rate, reliable tracking, and better noise control at elevated ISOs enable top-tier performance under gym lighting or outdoor variability.
The D800, while producing excellent JPEG output, lacks the speed to sustain competitive sports shoots.
Street Photography
Portability, discretion, and responsiveness drive excellent street photography. The D750’s lighter weight and smaller dimensions aid quick, unobtrusive capturing. Its quieter shutter (30–1/4000 shutter speed max, slower than D800’s 1/8000 but rarely consequential) and tilting screen help.
The D800’s size invites presence and might deter candids; however, its resolution is useful for large prints or editorial use.
Macro Photography
Both cameras lack specialized macro focusing features but deliver comparable performance with macro lenses. The D750’s advanced autofocus accuracy in live view assists in precise focusing on intricate subjects.
Night and Astro Photography
High ISO performance is crucial under low light; here, the D750’s sensor excels, with cleaner images at ISO 6400–12800 and superb noise control. D800 images at these ISOs reveal more grain, requiring noise reduction in post.
Neither model offers built-in astro modes, but both support long exposures and timelapse recording.
Video Capabilities
Neither camera targets videographers - limited to 1080p without 4K options.
- D750: Supports 1080/60p with H.264 codec, built-in stereo microphone, and microphone and headphone jacks, enabling real-time audio monitoring.
- D800: Max 1080/30p, similar audio inputs but without the D750’s smoother frame rates.
Neither offers in-body stabilization, but both support electronic VR lenses.
Travel Photography
For travel shooters, size, weight, battery life, and versatility matter. Here the D750 shines: lighter, longer battery life (~1230 shots vs. D800’s 900), dual SD card slots (vs. D800’s CF + SD), and better wireless connectivity (built-in Wi-Fi on D750, none on D800) facilitate quicker sharing and more flexible storage.
Durability, Battery, and Connectivity
Both cameras use the same EN-EL15 battery pack, but the D750 delivers longer endurance and faster overall system performance. The D750’s dual SD card slots offer redundancy or overflow options, whereas the D800 splits storage between a single CompactFlash Type I and an SD slot - an increasingly outdated format for some users.
Wireless capabilities distinguish the models further: The D750 includes built-in Wi-Fi for remote control and image transfer - a significant convenience - while the D800 lacks any built-in wireless options, requiring external adapters.
Lens Compatibility: Both share Nikon F mount with Identical Ecosystem
With 309 compatible Nikon F-mount lenses spanning everything from ultrawide primes to supertelephotos, both cameras benefit from Nikon’s extensive lens library. The full-frame “FX” compatibility ensures all lens choices are available, but the D750’s newer electronics better support CPU lenses with updates like vibration reduction control improvements.
Price-to-Performance Ratio & Market Position
Current second-hand prices (as of mid-2024) hover approximately:
- Nikon D750: $1,200 – $1,600 USD
- Nikon D800: $1,600 – $2,200 USD
When balanced against performance, the D750 offers exceptional value, especially for shooters prioritizing speed, versatility, and ease of use. The D800 commands a premium for its resolution and durability but is bulkier and slower in action.
Which Camera Fits Your Photography Style?
We break down genre-based recommendations integrating overall features:
- Portrait/Wedding/Event: Nikon D750 - versatile AF, better low light, excellent skin tones
- Landscape/Studio: Nikon D800 - ultra-high resolution, detailed files, rugged build
- Wildlife/Sports: Nikon D750 - faster burst, superior tracking, lighter for trekking
- Street: Nikon D750 - compact, quieter, Wi-Fi for instant sharing
- Macro: Slight edge to D750 for live view focusing, but both capable
- Night/Astro: Nikon D750 - better high ISO performance and noise handling
- Video: D750 - smoother frame rates, monitoring options
- Travel: D750 - size, battery, and wireless advantages
- Professional Workflow: D800 - higher-res RAW, slightly superior color depth, but D750 is more agile for mixed usage
Final Thoughts: My Personal Take From the Field
After extensive shooting sessions under varied scenarios, including controlled studio shoots, fast-paced wildlife tracking, and extensive landscape explorations - here is what I take away:
-
The Nikon D750 feels like an all-rounder, blending speed, modern usability, and excellent image quality in a manageable package. It's ideal for photographers who shoot diverse subjects or need a workhorse camera that delivers swiftly with consistently reliable results.
-
The Nikon D800 excels where image resolution is paramount and is tailored toward photographers who prioritize maximum detail, especially in print and commercial work. Its slower shooting rate and heavier body limit its use in action-heavy environments but reward discipline and precision with outstanding image files.
Both cameras have aged well with robust build quality and enduring Nikon lens compatibility, but the D750’s newer processor and sensor tech grant a subtle yet meaningful edge in real-world workflows.
In conclusion, the choice depends significantly on your shooting style and priorities. If speed, low-light versatility, and ergonomics top your list, the D750 stands out as the smarter buy – especially at current market prices. If ultimate resolution and detail are non-negotiable and you embrace methodical shooting, the D800 remains a formidable contender.
I hope this comparison empowers your next purchase decision. Investing in optics and accessories aligned to your primary needs will ultimately matter as much as the camera body itself. Happy shooting!
Appendix: Key Specifications Summary
Feature | Nikon D750 | Nikon D800 |
---|---|---|
Sensor | 24.3 MP Full-frame CMOS | 36.3 MP Full-frame CMOS |
Image Processor | Expeed 4 | Expeed 3 |
ISO Range (native) | 100–12,800 | 100–6,400 |
Autofocus Points | 51 (15 cross-type) | 51 (15 cross-type) |
Continuous Shooting | 6.5 fps | 4 fps |
Rear Screen | 3.2" 1229k-dot Tilting LCD | 3.2" 921k-dot Fixed LCD |
Viewfinder Coverage | 100% optical pentaprism | 100% optical pentaprism |
Video Resolution | 1080p up to 60fps | 1080p up to 30fps |
Storage Slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC | CF Type I + SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I |
Wireless Connectivity | Built-in Wi-Fi | None |
Battery Life (CIPA) | Approx. 1230 shots | Approx. 900 shots |
Weight | 840g | 900g |
Announced | September 2014 | June 2012 |
MSRP (at launch) | $1,999 | $2,999 |
Thank you for reading this Nikon D750 vs. D800 comparison. Feel free to reach out with questions or share your experiences with these cameras in the comments!
Nikon D750 vs Nikon D800 Specifications
Nikon D750 | Nikon D800 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Nikon |
Model type | Nikon D750 | Nikon D800 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2012-06-11 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Expeed 4 | Expeed 3 |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 35.9 x 24mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 861.6mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 36 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 5:4 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6016 x 4016 | 7360 x 4912 |
Maximum native ISO | 12800 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 51 | 51 |
Cross type focus points | 15 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Nikon F | Nikon F |
Number of lenses | 309 | 309 |
Crop factor | 1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3.2" | 3.2" |
Resolution of display | 1,229k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD with 170 degrees wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 6.5 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP high-speed sync, auto w/redeye reduction, auto slow sync, auto slow sync w/redeye reduction, fill flash, rear-curtain sync, rear-curtain w/slow sync, redeye reduction, redeye reduction w/slow sync, slow sync, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, Rear curtain, High-speed sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/200 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 424 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 840 gr (1.85 lbs) | 900 gr (1.98 lbs) |
Dimensions | 141 x 113 x 78mm (5.6" x 4.4" x 3.1") | 146 x 123 x 82mm (5.7" x 4.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 93 | 95 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.8 | 25.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.5 | 14.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 2956 | 2853 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 1230 photographs | 900 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL15 | EN-EL15 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10, 20 secs) | Yes (2 to 20 sec, 1 to 9 exposures at intervals of 0.5, 1, 2 or 3 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (dual slots) | Compact Flash (Type I), SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I compliant |
Storage slots | Dual | Dual |
Cost at release | $2,000 | $2,999 |