Sony A900 vs Sony W350
54 Imaging
66 Features
62 Overall
64
97 Imaging
36 Features
25 Overall
31
Sony A900 vs Sony W350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 895g - 156 x 117 x 82mm
- Introduced October 2008
- Replacement is Sony A99
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 91 x 52 x 17mm
- Revealed January 2010
Sony A900 vs Sony W350 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Sony A900 versus Sony W350, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are produced by Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the A900 (25MP) and W350 (14MP) and the A900 (Full frame) and W350 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe A900 was announced 14 months before the W350 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Sony A900 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony W350 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the A900 grades versus the W350 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sony A900 vs Sony W350 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350. The whole galleries are available at Sony A900 Gallery & Sony W350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Sony A900 over the Sony W350
A900 | W350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W350 over the Sony A900
W350 | A900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | October 2008 | More modern by 14 months |
Common features in the Sony A900 and Sony W350
A900 | W350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Sony A900 vs Sony W350 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Sony A900 offers physical dimensions of 156mm x 117mm x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs) while the Sony W350 has sizing of 91mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Analyze the Sony A900 versus Sony W350 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. Here is the front view size comparison of the A900 against the W350.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A900 and W350 is 54 and 97 respectively.
Sony A900 vs Sony W350 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over specs. The image below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the A900 and W350.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The A900 using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony A900 will deliver more detail with its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged A900 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Sony A900 vs Sony W350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Sony A900 vs Sony W350 Specifications
Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Sony | Sony |
Model | Sony Alpha DSLR-A900 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W350 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2008-10-22 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Bionz | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 35.9 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 861.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 25 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6048 x 4032 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Sony/Minolta Alpha | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
Number of lenses | 143 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 922k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT Xtra Fine color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 2 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 895 gr (1.97 lb) | 117 gr (0.26 lb) |
Dimensions | 156 x 117 x 82mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 3.2") | 91 x 52 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 79 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1431 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 880 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-FM500H | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Price at launch | $2,736 | $200 |