Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-M10 II
79 Imaging
68 Features
80 Overall
72
82 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Push to 204800)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 445g - 135 x 94 x 44mm
- Released June 2021
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-M10 II, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the Z fc (21MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) and the Z fc (APS-C) and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Z fc was launched 5 years after the E-M10 II which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Z fc matches up vs the E-M10 II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Z fc & Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The complete galleries are available at Nikon Z fc Gallery & Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon Z fc over the Olympus E-M10 II
| Z fc | E-M10 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2021 | August 2015 | More modern by 72 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Nikon Z fc
| E-M10 II | Z fc |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon Z fc and Olympus E-M10 II
| Z fc | E-M10 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 1040k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon Z fc has got outer dimensions of 135mm x 94mm x 44mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 1.7") along with a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 II has measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Compare the Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-M10 II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the Z fc versus the E-M10 II.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Z fc and E-M10 II is 79 and 82 respectively.
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking technical specs. The picture underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Z fc and E-M10 II.
As you have seen, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Z fc featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Nikon Z fc will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more modern Z fc will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
| Nikon Z fc | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Z fc | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2021-06-28 | 2015-08-25 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5568 x 3712 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 51200 | 25600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 204800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 209 | 81 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 21 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.62x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 11.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 445 gr (0.98 lb) | 390 gr (0.86 lb) |
| Dimensions | 135 x 94 x 44mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 1.7") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 842 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | 320 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL25 | BLS-50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $949 | $499 |