Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PM1
79 Imaging
68 Features
80 Overall
72
89 Imaging
47 Features
52 Overall
49
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Raise to 204800)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 445g - 135 x 94 x 44mm
- Revealed June 2021
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched November 2011
- Renewed by Olympus E-PM2
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PM1 Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Nikon Z fc versus Olympus E-PM1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the Z fc (21MP) and E-PM1 (12MP) and the Z fc (APS-C) and E-PM1 (Four Thirds) possess different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Z fc was released 9 years later than the E-PM1 and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Nikon Z fc being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the Z fc matches up versus the E-PM1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PM1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Z fc and Olympus PEN E-PM1. The complete galleries are available at Nikon Z fc Gallery and Olympus E-PM1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon Z fc over the Olympus E-PM1
| Z fc | E-PM1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2021 | November 2011 | Fresher by 117 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Nikon Z fc
| E-PM1 | Z fc |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon Z fc and Olympus E-PM1
| Z fc | E-PM1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PM1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon Z fc features external measurements of 135mm x 94mm x 44mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 445 grams (0.98 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM1 has dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).
Examine the Nikon Z fc versus Olympus E-PM1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is the front view size comparison of the Z fc and the E-PM1.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Z fc and E-PM1 is 79 and 89 respectively.
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PM1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing specifications. The photograph here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Z fc and E-PM1.
To sum up, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The Z fc because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Nikon Z fc will deliver extra detail as a result of its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher Z fc should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Nikon Z fc vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications
| Nikon Z fc | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Z fc | Olympus PEN E-PM1 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2021-06-28 | 2011-11-23 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 5568 x 3712 | 4032 x 3024 |
| Max native ISO | 51200 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | 204800 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 209 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 21 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames per second | 6.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 445 gr (0.98 lbs) | 265 gr (0.58 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 135 x 94 x 44mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 1.7") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 52 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 499 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 330 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL25 | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $949 | $499 |