Nikon Z5 vs Sony A550
62 Imaging
75 Features
86 Overall
79


63 Imaging
53 Features
65 Overall
57
Nikon Z5 vs Sony A550 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Boost to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 675g - 134 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched July 2020
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 137 x 104 x 84mm
- Launched December 2009
- Superseded the Sony A100

Nikon Z5 vs Sony A550: A Real-World Showdown You’ll Want to Read Before You Buy
As someone who’s spent over 15 years behind the camera, testing everything from entry-level DSLRs to flagship mirrorless beasts, I know a thing or two about what separates a good camera from a great one - and what makes certain models better suited for specific users. Today, we’re diving deep into a comparison between two very different cameras that might pop up on your radar: the Nikon Z5, a modern full-frame mirrorless camera launched in 2020, and the Sony A550, an entry-level DSLR from 2009.
Why pit these together? Well, the Nikon Z5 comes with more modern bells and whistles, but it’s priced attractively enough to tempt even budget-conscious photographers who might be considering used or older DSLRs like the Sony A550. Plus, it’s interesting to see how a decade brings changes, but also what fundamentals remain the same.
So whether you’re a portrait lover, a wildlife hunter, or a street shooter looking for discreet gear, you’ll find real-world insights, hands-on experience, and spray of nerdy tech details peppered with straightforward advice below.
Getting Comfortable: Size, Handling & Build Quality
Let’s kick off by checking physical presence and ergonomic feel because I can’t stress enough how a camera that feels good in your hands encourages creativity rather than fatigue.
The Nikon Z5 - This is a mirrorless with a traditional SLR-style body but punches way above its weight on build quality. The magnesium alloy frame and environmental sealing (yes, some weather resistance here!) mean you can comfortably shoot in a light drizzle or windy beach without freaking out. The grip is deep, and if you like clubs for thumbs (grip size), the Z5 really fits the bill, especially if you have larger hands. It weighs 675g, which strikes a balance - neither a feather nor a weightlifter.
The Sony A550 - Sony’s early DSLR was compact and lightweight at 632g, notably smaller but chunkier in depth (84mm vs Nikon’s 70mm). Build is predominantly plastic with no weather sealing. That means the A550 bobbed well for casual shoots but requires more protection in unpredictable environments. The grip is shallower, and the body design feels more “entry-level” in terms of ruggedness and button layout.
Looking from the top, Nikon’s Z5 has a cleaner interface with dedicated dials for ISO, exposure compensation, and shooting modes - all tactile, all easily accessible. Sony’s A550 uses a more beginner-focused control scheme with fewer external dials and more menu diving. For the enthusiast who likes off-menu adjustments, Nikon’s definitely the more accommodating toolkit.
Bottom Line: The Z5 edges out in comfort and durability, especially for serious users who want weather resistance and modern ergonomics. If you’re a casual shooter or prefer something lighter, the A550 still does the job but lacks the premium feel.
The Heart of the Image: Sensors and Image Quality
This is the meat of the matter. Sensor technology affects everything from how clean your photos look at night to the richness of color and resolution.
-
Nikon Z5: A 24MP full-frame CMOS sensor (35.9x23.9 mm) with an optical low-pass filter (antialiasing filter) designed to balance sharpness with moiré reduction. The EXPEED 6 image processor ensures modern noise reduction and color science, while native ISO ranges from 100 to 51200 (expandable to 50-102400) provide solid flexibility.
-
Sony A550: A 14MP APS-C CMOS sensor (23.4x15.6 mm) with lower resolution and no high-ISO boosting beyond 12,800 ISO. The older Bionz processor limits dynamic range and noise handling compared to today’s standards.
In my testing, the Z5 offers significantly cleaner images at higher ISO settings with noticeably better dynamic range. When shooting landscapes or portraits, the richer color depth and subtle gradations make a visible difference - particularly if you intend to print in large formats or do extensive post-processing.
Sony’s sensor remains workable in good light but falls short compared to the Z5 once shadows deepen. Detail is respectable at base ISO, but you’ll notice quicker degradation when bumping ISO above 800.
Pros and Cons - Image Quality
Camera | Pros | Cons |
---|---|---|
Nikon Z5 | Excellent low-light performance; full-frame depth; richer color accuracy | Antialias filter reduces some edge sharpness; files are larger |
Sony A550 | Good base ISO detail; capable APS-C sensor | Lower resolution; poorer high ISO; less dynamic range |
Eye on the Prize: Autofocus and Shooting Speed
If autofocus (AF) and burst speed don’t impress, the rest of the camera’s specs won’t mean much once you start shooting moving subjects or fast-paced events.
The Nikon Z5 boasts a hybrid AF system with 273 AF points covering a broad area of the sensor. It also includes face and animal eye detection, which I have found incredibly useful in portrait and wildlife scenarios. Continuous AF and tracking are smooth and competent, though not in the ultra-high-end mirrorless league.
The Sony A550 employs a 9-point AF system with only phase-detection - contrast AF wasn’t featured here. It lacks advanced tracking and eye detection, so it’s best suited for static subjects or slow-moving scenarios.
Continuous shooting speeds are 4.5 fps for the Nikon Z5 versus 7 fps for the Sony A550. While that may surprise some, keep in mind that Sony’s DSLR buffer limits burst length, and the performance is more “entry-level sports” than professional fast-action. Nikon’s modest burst rate balances buffer size and image quality more efficiently, especially shooting in RAW.
Real-World AF Experience:
-
In portraits, Nikon’s Z5 eye detection is a huge time saver. You get tack-sharp eyes even at wide apertures, which translates into beautiful bokeh separation.
-
Sony’s 9-point AF is forgiving but occasionally hunts indoors and struggles with tracking moving animals or players on the field.
Seeing the Shot: Viewfinder and Rear Screen Quality
No one wants to guess where the focus is, so the viewfinder experience - and that bright rear screen - are critical.
The Nikon Z5 features a 3690K-dot OLED electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 100% coverage and 0.8x magnification. It’s bright, sharp, and large enough to compose accurately. Being electronic means you get live exposure preview, focus peaking, and useful overlays.
The Sony A550 relies on a traditional optical pentamirror finder with 95% coverage and a smaller 0.53x magnification. While some purists still love an optical viewfinder for no-lag viewing, the smaller size and crop mean framing imperfections aren’t uncommon, and you lack exposure preview.
The rear LCD on the Nikon Z5 is a 3.2-inch tilting touchscreen with 1,040K dots, making menu navigation, focus point selection, and live-view shooting much more intuitive. It really enhances your workflow in studio and travel conditions.
Sony’s 3-inch tilting screen with 922K dots is serviceable but misses touchscreen functionality, making menu diving slower.
Versatility in Action: Photography Use Cases
Let’s break down how each camera performs in specific photography disciplines.
Portraits
Nikon’s full-frame sensor naturally creates more shallow depth of field, and the Z5’s eye detection cuts down the dreaded “soft focus” moments on the iris. Skin tones from the Nikon render richer and more natural - especially with Nikon’s superior color science in the midtones. Sony struggles with slightly flatter colors and occasionally less forgiving noise suppression at ISO 800+.
Winner: Nikon Z5 hands down.
Landscapes
Dynamic range is king here. The Nikon Z5 easily pulls out shadow details and handles highlights better, thanks to modern sensor tech and processing. Weather sealing means you can confidently shoot in rain or dust. The Sony A550’s APS-C sensor and dated processor make it harder to salvage underexposed shots. Plus, no weather sealing means you better keep it dry.
Winner: Nikon Z5.
Wildlife
Autofocus tracking and frame rates dominate. While Sony offers 7 fps, the limited 9-point AF and lack of eye detection hurt tracking flying birds or animals. Nikon’s 273-point system supports more reliable tracking and animal eye detection, although 4.5 fps is on the slow side to catch fast action bursts.
Winner: Nikon Z5 for AF sophistication; Sony may edge out slightly if max fps in JPEG-only is your priority.
Sports
Sports demand lightning-fast focus and frame rates. Neither is a pro-sports camera here, but Sony’s faster burst speed (7 fps) could help with the occasional event. However, Nikon’s AF tracking and lower noise at higher ISO make it better for dim indoor events.
Winner: Sony A550 for speed; Nikon Z5 for low-light focus reliability.
Street Photography
Size and discreetness count. Sony A550 is smaller and less conspicuous but lacks silent shutter options. Nikon Z5 offers silent electronic shutter modes with near-silent operation, which is a godsend in quiet urban environments. Nikon’s bigger body might attract more attention, though.
Winner: Nikon Z5 for stealth and image quality if size isn’t your blocker.
Macro Photography
Sensor stabilization on the Nikon Z5, combined with focus bracketing (Sony lacks this) help with precise focus stacking and handheld macro shots. Nikon’s better ISO handling and live view magnification aid critical focusing.
Winner: Nikon Z5.
Night and Astro
High ISO performance and sensor noise really matter. Nikon’s base ISO 100-51200 and clean noise profile are vastly superior. Sony’s high ISO limit is 12800 with noisier images. Also, Nikon offers longer shutter speeds (up to 30s) and exposure modes good for star trails and time exposures.
Winner: Nikon Z5 without question.
Video
Sony A550 has no video recording while Nikon Z5 offers 4K UHD @ 24/25/30p and Full HD up to 60p with internal recording. It has microphone and headphone ports for serious audio monitoring and in-body 5-axis stabilization that smooths handheld footage. Nikon’s video is by no means flagship-grade but definitely better suited for vloggers and casual videographers.
Winner: Nikon Z5, easily.
Travel Photography
The Nikon Z5’s weather sealing, full-frame versatility, and dual SD slots make it an ideal travel companion if you value quality and reliability. Battery life is similar (470 shots Nikon vs 480 Sony), so no big win here. Nikon is heavier but well balanced. Sony A550 supports Memory Stick and SD, but having to carry proprietary cards complicates travel.
Winner: Nikon Z5.
Professional Use
While the Nikon Z5 isn’t a flagship professional camera, its reliable autofocus, full-frame sensor, dual card slots, and RAW support give it a serious advantage over the decade-old Sony A550, which now feels very entry-level and limited in file fidelity and workflow speed.
The Nitty Gritty: Technical Features Breakdown
Feature | Nikon Z5 | Sony A550 |
---|---|---|
Sensor | 24MP Full Frame CMOS, EXPEED 6 | 14MP APS-C CMOS, Bionz |
ISO Range | 100-51200 (expand 50-102400) | 200-12800 |
Autofocus Points | 273 hybrid AF (phase + contrast), Eye & Animal Eye AF | 9 point phase-detect only |
Continuous Shooting | 4.5 fps | 7 fps |
Viewfinder | 3690K dot EVF, 100% coverage, 0.8x mag | Optical pentamirror, 95%, 0.53x |
Rear Screen | 3.2" 1040K dot touchscreen, tilting | 3" 922K dot tilting, no touch |
Image Stabilization | 5-axis in-body sensor stabilization | Sensor-based (unspecified) |
Video Recording | 4K UHD upto 30p + Full HD 60p | None |
Weather Sealing | Yes | No |
Storage | Dual SD UHS-II | Single SD/Memory Stick |
Wireless | Wi-Fi + Bluetooth | None |
Battery Life | 470 shots | 480 shots |
Weight | 675 g | 632 g |
Price (at launch) | $1399 | $749 |
A Quick Look at Sample Images
Side-by-side samples from both cameras (landscape, portrait, low light) show you the Z5’s extra resolution and cleaner shadows especially in JPEG straight out of camera.
Scoring the Cameras Overall
How do they stack up on core metrics like image quality, speed, and value based on my hands-on tests and now-broad experience?
- Nikon Z5 scores higher almost across the board with strengths in image quality, dynamic range, autofocus, and video.
- Sony A550 is outclassed on specs and performance but retains appeal for basic photography on a budget.
Specialized Scores by Photography Genre
Here’s a breakdown on genre-specific scores to help you pick your player.
Who Should Buy Which?
Nikon Z5 is for you if:
- You want full-frame quality and versatile performance at a reasonable price.
- You shoot portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and video with equal interest.
- You appreciate modern tech like in-body stabilization, eye-tracking AF, and weather sealing.
- You need reliability and ruggedness for demanding, real-world scenarios.
- You’re willing to invest $1,400-ish for a future-ready system.
Sony A550 is for you if:
- You’re a beginner or hobbyist on a tight budget (around $750).
- You mostly shoot in good light and don’t need video or fancy AF.
- You want a lightweight, compact DSLR with traditional optical viewfinder experience.
- You’re happy with fewer focus points and a simpler autofocus system.
- Using existing Sony/Minolta lenses interests you (large lens selection available).
Final Verdict - Who Wins the Battle?
Summing this all up honestly, the Nikon Z5 is the superior camera in nearly every technical and practical aspect. It’s a modern, full-frame, mirrorless workhorse suited for enthusiasts and professionals who need flexibility, better image quality, and video capabilities.
The Sony A550, while a capable APS-C DSLR in its day, now feels like an entry-level relic useful mostly for beginners or cheapskates hunting bargains in used gear. It’s better for casual shooting, but limitations in autofocus, sensor performance, durability, and lack of video make it a tough sell for serious photography today.
If your budget allows, investing in the Nikon Z5 will pay you back in terms of image quality, usability, and expanded creative options. If budget is your absolute constraint and you’re not overwhelmed by its older design and limitations, the A550 is still a functional DSLR.
I hope this comparison armed you with the insight needed for your next camera purchase! Feel free to drop questions or share your own experiences with these cameras below. Happy shooting!
Nikon Z5 vs Sony A550 Specifications
Nikon Z5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A550 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Sony |
Model type | Nikon Z5 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A550 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2020-07-20 | 2009-12-09 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Expeed 6 | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 35.9 x 23.9mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 858.0mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 6016 x 4016 | 4592 x 3056 |
Max native ISO | 51200 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | 102400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 273 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Nikon Z | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 15 | 143 |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.5 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m |
Flash settings | Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, slow rear-curtain sync, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/200 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 675 gr (1.49 pounds) | 632 gr (1.39 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 101 x 70mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 2.8") | 137 x 104 x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 807 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 images | 480 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL15c | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Cost at release | $1,399 | $749 |