Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-420
74 Imaging
68 Features
84 Overall
74
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-420 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Raise to 204800)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 397g - 127 x 94 x 60mm
- Announced October 2019
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released June 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-410
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-420 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Nikon Z50 and Olympus E-420, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the Z50 (21MP) and E-420 (10MP) and the Z50 (APS-C) and E-420 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segmentsThe Z50 was brought out 11 years after the E-420 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Nikon Z50 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-420 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the Z50 grades vs the E-420 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-420 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Z50 & Olympus E-420. The entire galleries are available at Nikon Z50 Gallery & Olympus E-420 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon Z50 over the Olympus E-420
| Z50 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2019 |  | June 2008 | Newer by 138 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3.2" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-420 over the Nikon Z50
| E-420 | Z50 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon Z50 and Olympus E-420
| Z50 | E-420 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing |
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-420 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon Z50 enjoys external dimensions of 127mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs) and the Olympus E-420 has dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Compare the Nikon Z50 and Olympus E-420 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the Z50 against the E-420.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z50 and E-420 is 74 and 77 respectively.
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-420 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by checking out technical specs. The pic underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Z50 and E-420.
As you can tell, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Z50 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Nikon Z50 will show greater detail having its extra 11MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The newer Z50 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-420 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observationsLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus E-420 Specifications
| Nikon Z50 | Olympus E-420 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon Z50 | Olympus E-420 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Announced | 2019-10-10 | 2008-06-23 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Expeed 6 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 5568 x 3712 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 51200 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 204800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 209 | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 15 | 45 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.2" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 11.0fps | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (at ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 397 grams (0.88 lbs) | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 127 x 94 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 56 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.5 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 527 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | 500 shots |
| Type of battery | Built-in | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL25 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $857 | $999 |
