Nikon Z50 vs Olympus 7040
74 Imaging
68 Features
84 Overall
74
95 Imaging
36 Features
31 Overall
34
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus 7040 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 21MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Boost to 204800)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 397g - 127 x 94 x 60mm
- Introduced October 2019
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 144g - 95 x 56 x 26mm
- Launched January 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju 7040
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon Z50 vs Olympus 7040 Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Nikon Z50 versus Olympus 7040, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Nikon and Olympus. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the Z50 (21MP) and 7040 (14MP) and the Z50 (APS-C) and 7040 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Z50 was launched 9 years after the 7040 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Nikon Z50 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 7040 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the Z50 matches up vs the 7040 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon Z50 vs Olympus 7040 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Z50 and Olympus Stylus 7040. The complete galleries are available at Nikon Z50 Gallery and Olympus 7040 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon Z50 over the Olympus 7040
| Z50 | 7040 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | October 2019 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 119 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen sizing | 3.2" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 7040 over the Nikon Z50
| 7040 | Z50 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon Z50 and Olympus 7040
| Z50 | 7040 |
|---|
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus 7040 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon Z50 comes with external measurements of 127mm x 94mm x 60mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.4") along with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs) whilst the Olympus 7040 has dimensions of 95mm x 56mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 144 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon Z50 versus Olympus 7040 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the Z50 vs the 7040.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Z50 and 7040 is 74 and 95 respectively.
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus 7040 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specifications. The image here will give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the Z50 and 7040.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Z50 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Nikon Z50 will deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer Z50 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus 7040 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon Z50 vs Olympus 7040 Specifications
| Nikon Z50 | Olympus Stylus 7040 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Z50 | Olympus Stylus 7040 |
| Alternative name | - | mju 7040 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2019-10-10 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Expeed 6 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 21MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5568 x 3712 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 51200 | 1600 |
| Max boosted ISO | 204800 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 209 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Nikon Z | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-196mm (7.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
| Amount of lenses | 15 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 11.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.70 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 397 gr (0.88 pounds) | 144 gr (0.32 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 127 x 94 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.7" x 2.4") | 95 x 56 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Built-in | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL25 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $857 | $299 |