Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M1 II
61 Imaging
80 Features
92 Overall
84
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 46MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 705g - 134 x 101 x 70mm
- Launched October 2020
- Succeeded the Nikon Z7
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the Z7 II (46MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the Z7 II (Full frame) and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) offer different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe Z7 II was released 4 years after the E-M1 II which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the Z7 II scores against the E-M1 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Z7 Mark II & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon Z7 II Gallery & Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon Z7 II over the Olympus E-M1 II
Z7 II | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2020 | September 2016 | More modern by 50 months | |
Screen size | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 2100k | 1037k | Clearer screen (+1063k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Nikon Z7 II
E-M1 II | Z7 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Nikon Z7 II and Olympus E-M1 II
Z7 II | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon Z7 II enjoys outside measurements of 134mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 2.8") having a weight of 705 grams (1.55 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has proportions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M1 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the Z7 II compared to the E-M1 II.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Z7 II and E-M1 II is 61 and 68 respectively.
Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out a spec sheet. The pic below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the Z7 II and E-M1 II.
Clearly, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Z7 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Nikon Z7 II will show extra detail as a result of its extra 26 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more recent Z7 II should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Nikon Z7 Mark II | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Z7 Mark II | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2020-10-14 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 35.9 x 23.9mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 858.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 46MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 8256 x 5504 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 32 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 493 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 15 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 2,100 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | 60.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, slow rear-curtain sync, off | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/200s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 144 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MOV, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 705 gr (1.55 lb) | 574 gr (1.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 101 x 70mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 2.8") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | 350 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | CFexpress (Type B), XQD, SD (UHS-II) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | 2 | 2 |
Cost at launch | $2,997 | $1,700 |