Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M10 III
61 Imaging
80 Features
92 Overall
84
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 46MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 64 - 25600 (Push to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 705g - 134 x 101 x 70mm
- Announced October 2020
- Old Model is Nikon Z7
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 IV
Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M10 III, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the Z7 II (46MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) and the Z7 II (Full frame) and E-M10 III (Four Thirds) possess different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Z7 II was revealed 3 years later than the E-M10 III and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the Z7 II grades against the E-M10 III with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Z7 Mark II & Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The full galleries are available at Nikon Z7 II Gallery & Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon Z7 II over the Olympus E-M10 III
Z7 II | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2020 | August 2017 | More recent by 38 months | |
Display dimension | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 2100k | 1040k | Crisper display (+1060k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Nikon Z7 II
E-M10 III | Z7 II |
---|
Common features in the Nikon Z7 II and Olympus E-M10 III
Z7 II | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon Z7 II has got outer dimensions of 134mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 705 grams (1.55 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 III has dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Compare the Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M10 III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the Z7 II compared to the E-M10 III.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the Z7 II and E-M10 III is 61 and 80 respectively.
Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Z7 II and E-M10 III.
As you have seen, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Z7 II using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Nikon Z7 II will show greater detail because of its extra 30MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent Z7 II provides an edge in sensor tech.
Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon Z7 II vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
Nikon Z7 Mark II | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Z7 Mark II | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2020-10-14 | 2017-08-31 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 35.9 x 23.9mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 858.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 46 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 5:4, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 8256 x 5504 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | 32 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 493 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 15 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 2,100k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 8.6 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, slow rear-curtain sync, off | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/200 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 144 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 705 gr (1.55 pounds) | 410 gr (0.90 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 101 x 70mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 2.8") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 shots | 330 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | CFexpress (Type B), XQD, SD (UHS-II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
Launch cost | $2,997 | $650 |