Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II
51 Imaging
81 Features
90 Overall
84
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9176/b91760eb1050f612041b91a717648f1dc76f69e3" alt="Nikon Z9 front Nikon Z9 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 46MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 64 - 25600 (Push to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 1340g - 149 x 150 x 91mm
- Released October 2021
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Nikon Z9 and Olympus E-M10 II, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the Z9 (46MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) and the Z9 (Full frame) and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The Z9 was introduced 6 years later than the E-M10 II and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the Z9 grades against the E-M10 II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Z9 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The whole galleries are viewable at Nikon Z9 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon Z9 over the Olympus E-M10 II
Z9 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2021 | ![]() | August 2015 | More recent by 76 months |
Screen dimensions | 3.2" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 2089k | ![]() | 1040k | Sharper screen (+1049k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Nikon Z9
E-M10 II | Z9 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon Z9 and Olympus E-M10 II
Z9 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon Z9 offers external dimensions of 149mm x 150mm x 91mm (5.9" x 5.9" x 3.6") having a weight of 1340 grams (2.95 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 II has measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Check the Nikon Z9 and Olympus E-M10 II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the Z9 against the E-M10 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7191/e7191e02c996ec00a9d8b648e665e739b7c6caf8" alt="Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Z9 and E-M10 II is 51 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5750a/5750a10c760a34c3455f97a8278b0f1b1879214b" alt="Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison"
Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Z9 and E-M10 II.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The Z9 having a bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Nikon Z9 will resolve greater detail using its extra 30 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern Z9 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9013c/9013cbd8d00bc28a8902fb424ced7b0fc35cb7da" alt="Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison"
Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d46b9/d46b97a9b22c473621960b6daaa33d70abd0c9ac" alt="Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Nikon Z9 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Nikon Z9 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Z9 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2021-10-28 | 2015-08-25 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | Stacked CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 35.9 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 858.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 46 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8256 x 5504 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 32 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 493 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Nikon Z | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 29 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 2,089 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,686 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.8x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 900 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | - | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash options | Front-curtain sync, Rear-curtain sync, Red-eye reduction, Red-eye reduction with slow sync, Slow sync Off | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/200 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 7680 x 4320 @ 30p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 25p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 120p, MOV, ProRes, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 120p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 100p, MOV, ProRes, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 100p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 100p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p, MOV, ProRes, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p, MOV, ProRes, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, ProRes, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MOV, ProRes, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MOV, ProRes, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, L | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 7680x4320 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, H.265 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1340 grams (2.95 lbs) | 390 grams (0.86 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 149 x 150 x 91mm (5.9" x 5.9" x 3.6") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 740 shots | 320 shots |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL18d | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual CFexpress Type B slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | One |
Launch price | $5,500 | $499 |