OM System OM-1 vs Olympus E-M1 II
65 Imaging
63 Features
96 Overall
76
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
OM System OM-1 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 599g - 135 x 92 x 73mm
- Launched February 2022
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
OM System OM-1 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the OM System OM-1 versus Olympus E-M1 II, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras and both are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the OM System OM-1 (20MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe OM System OM-1 was unveiled 5 years after the E-M1 II which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the OM System OM-1 grades against the E-M1 II for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
OM System OM-1 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for OM System OM-1 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The full galleries are available at OM System OM-1 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick OM System OM-1 over the Olympus E-M1 II
OM System OM-1 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2022 | September 2016 | More modern by 66 months | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 1037k | Crisper screen (+583k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the OM System OM-1
E-M1 II | OM System OM-1 |
---|
Common features in the OM System OM-1 and Olympus E-M1 II
OM System OM-1 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
Screen sizing | 3.00" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
OM System OM-1 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you should think about its weight and size. The OM System OM-1 has got physical measurements of 135mm x 92mm x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") with a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has specifications of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Compare the OM System OM-1 versus Olympus E-M1 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the OM System OM-1 vs the E-M1 II.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the OM System OM-1 and E-M1 II is 65 and 68 respectively.
OM System OM-1 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading through a spec sheet. The image below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the OM System OM-1 and E-M1 II.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact resolution so you should expect similar quality of pictures although you need to consider the release date of the products into consideration. The younger OM System OM-1 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
OM System OM-1 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
OM System OM-1 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
OM System OM-1 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | OM System OM-1 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2022-02-15 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | Stacked BSI Live MOS Sensor | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 102400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 80 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 1053 | 121 |
Cross focus points | 1053 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 118 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,620k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.83x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/8000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 60.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265, HEVC | MOV, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 599 gr (1.32 lbs) | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 135 x 92 x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 520 photographs | 350 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLX-1 | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | Two | Two |
Pricing at release | $2,199 | $1,700 |