OM System OM-1 vs Panasonic G95
Portability
65 Imaging
63 Features
96 Overall
76
65 Imaging
63 Features
96 Overall
76
Portability
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
OM System OM-1 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
OM System OM-1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 599g - 135 x 92 x 73mm
- Launched February 2022
Panasonic G95
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Released April 2019
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-G90
- Superseded the Panasonic G85
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms OM System OM-1 vs Panasonic G95 Overview
Lets look more closely at the OM System OM-1 vs Panasonic G95, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the OM System OM-1 (20MP) and the G95 (20.3MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe OM System OM-1 was released 2 years after the G95 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the OM System OM-1 scores against the G95 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban OM System OM-1 vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for OM System OM-1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The complete galleries are viewable at OM System OM-1 Gallery and Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick OM System OM-1 over the Panasonic G95
| OM System OM-1 | G95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2022 |  | April 2019 | More modern by 35 months |
| Screen resolution | 1620k |  | 1240k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the OM System OM-1
| G95 | OM System OM-1 |
|---|
Common features in the OM System OM-1 and Panasonic G95
| OM System OM-1 | G95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3.00" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Both good for selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
OM System OM-1 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The OM System OM-1 enjoys exterior measurements of 135mm x 92mm x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") and a weight of 599 grams (1.32 lbs) and the Panasonic G95 has sizing of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") along with a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
See the OM System OM-1 vs Panasonic G95 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the OM System OM-1 against the G95.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the OM System OM-1 and G95 is 65 and 67 respectively.
OM System OM-1 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by looking through specs. The picture here should give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the OM System OM-1 and G95.
All in all, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Panasonic G95 to render more detail as a result of its extra 0.3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The fresher OM System OM-1 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
OM System OM-1 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
OM System OM-1 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic G95 as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focus
supports RAW files
has manual focus
decent megapixels (20.3 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
OM System OM-1 Street photography highlights
Panasonic G95 Street photography highlights
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
offers touch to focus
weather proof
good high ISO (25,600)
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
boasts focus by touch
weather proofing
good ISO range (25,600)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
OM System OM-1 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic G95 as a Sports photography camera
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather proof
better than average battery pack (520 shots)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
silent mode (1/16,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20.3MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
weather proofing
not so great battery power (290 CIPA)
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Travel photography with OM System OM-1
Travel photography with Panasonic G95
better than average battery pack (520 shots)
weather proof
connects via bluetooth
offers touch to focus
MP count good (20MP)
selfie friendly display
weather proofing
supports bluetooth
boasts focus by touch
decent megapixels (20.3 megapixels)
flash built-in
selfie friendly screen
not so great battery power (290 CIPA)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
OM System OM-1 as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic G95 as a Landscape photography camera
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3.00 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
weather proof
better than average battery pack (520 shots)
has dual storage slots
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20.3 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
weather proofing
not so great battery power (290 per charge)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
OM System OM-1 Vlogging info
Panasonic G95 Vlogging info
selfie friendly display
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection focus
good video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes external microphone jack
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
includes external mic jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
OM System OM-1 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
| OM System OM-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | OM System OM-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
| Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2022-02-15 | 2019-04-05 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | Stacked BSI Live MOS Sensor | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20.3 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 80 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 1053 | 49 |
| Cross type focus points | 1053 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 118 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 1,620 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.83x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265, HEVC | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 599 gr (1.32 lbs) | 536 gr (1.18 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 135 x 92 x 73mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.9") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 520 images | 290 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLX-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
| Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $2,199 | $998 |