OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M1 II
80 Imaging
64 Features
88 Overall
73
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2022
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
In this article, we are matching up the OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M1 II, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Pro Mirrorless and both of them are sold by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the OM System OM-5 (20MP) and the E-M1 II (20MP) is fairly close and they possess the same exact sensor size (Four Thirds).
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe OM System OM-5 was introduced 6 years after the E-M1 II which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the OM System OM-5 matches up against the E-M1 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for OM System OM-5 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The whole galleries are provided at OM System OM-5 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick OM System OM-5 over the Olympus E-M1 II
OM System OM-5 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2022 | September 2016 | More modern by 75 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1037k | Crisper display (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the OM System OM-5
E-M1 II | OM System OM-5 |
---|
Common features in the OM System OM-5 and Olympus E-M1 II
OM System OM-5 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Display sizing | 3.00" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Selfie screen | Both are selfie friendly | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The OM System OM-5 provides outer dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 II has measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Contrast the OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M1 II in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the OM System OM-5 and the E-M1 II.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the OM System OM-5 and E-M1 II is 80 and 68 respectively.
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the OM System OM-5 and E-M1 II.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP and you should expect comparable quality of files but you need to take the release date of the cameras into account. The newer OM System OM-5 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
OM System OM-5 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | OM System OM-5 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2022-10-26 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 119 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 10.0fps | 60.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/250 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MOV, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lb) | 574 gr (1.27 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | 350 shots |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | Single | 2 |
Cost at release | $1,200 | $1,700 |