OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10
80 Imaging
63 Features
88 Overall
73
 
               
              82 Imaging
52 Features
73 Overall
60
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Announced October 2022
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 II
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 Overview
Here is a complete assessment of the OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are created by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the OM System OM-5 (20MP) and E-M10 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (Four Thirds).
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe OM System OM-5 was released 8 years later than the E-M10 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the OM System OM-5 scores vs the E-M10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video        OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for OM System OM-5 and Olympus OM-D E-M10. The complete galleries are available at OM System OM-5 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick OM System OM-5 over the Olympus E-M10
| OM System OM-5 | E-M10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2022 |  | March 2014 | Fresher by 105 months | 
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | 
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 1037k | Sharper screen (+3k dot) | 
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | 
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the OM System OM-5
| E-M10 | OM System OM-5 | 
|---|
Common features in the OM System OM-5 and Olympus E-M10
| OM System OM-5 | E-M10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3.00" |  | 3" | Same screen size | 
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate | 
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The OM System OM-5 enjoys exterior dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 has measurements of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") along with a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check out the OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the OM System OM-5 and the E-M10.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the OM System OM-5 and E-M10 is 80 and 82 respectively.
 
          OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The visual below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the OM System OM-5 and E-M10.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should expect the OM System OM-5 to give more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The younger OM System OM-5 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
 
          OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder
 
         Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
 President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
 Photography Glossary
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
        
                
        OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications
| OM System OM-5 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus | 
| Model | OM System OM-5 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | 
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless | 
| Announced | 2022-10-26 | 2014-03-18 | 
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII | 
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS | 
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds | 
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm | 
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 16MP | 
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 | 
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 | 
| Min native ISO | 200 | 200 | 
| RAW images | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 64 | - | 
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 81 | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds | 
| Number of lenses | 119 | 107 | 
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 | 
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting | 
| Screen size | 3.00 inches | 3 inches | 
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic | 
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot | 
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% | 
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.58x | 
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s | 
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s | 
| Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - | 
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes | 
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m (ISO100) | 
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) | 
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250s | 1/250s | 
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 | 
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG | 
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | Optional | 
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 414g (0.91 lbs) | 396g (0.87 lbs) | 
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 72 | 
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 | 
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 | 
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 884 | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 images | 320 images | 
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack | 
| Battery model | BLS-50 | BLS-5 | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) | 
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC | 
| Storage slots | Single | Single | 
| Launch cost | $1,200 | $600 | 



