OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 IV
Portability
80 Imaging
64 Features
88 Overall
73
80 Imaging
64 Features
88 Overall
73
Portability
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Key Specs
OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2022
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 III
Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Introduced August 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 III
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the OM System OM-5 versus Olympus E-M10 IV, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the OM System OM-5 (20MP) and the E-M10 IV (20MP) is relatively similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe OM System OM-5 was launched 2 years later than the E-M10 IV and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise summary of how the OM System OM-5 matches up versus the E-M10 IV for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for OM System OM-5 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV. The complete galleries are available at OM System OM-5 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick OM System OM-5 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| OM System OM-5 | E-M10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2022 |  | August 2020 | More recent by 28 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the OM System OM-5
| E-M10 IV | OM System OM-5 |
|---|
Common features in the OM System OM-5 and Olympus E-M10 IV
| OM System OM-5 | E-M10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3.00" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 1040k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Both good for selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and measurements. The OM System OM-5 enjoys physical measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 IV has proportions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs).
Contrast the OM System OM-5 versus Olympus E-M10 IV in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the OM System OM-5 compared to the E-M10 IV.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the OM System OM-5 and E-M10 IV is 80 and 81 respectively.
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading technical specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the OM System OM-5 and E-M10 IV.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs though you really should consider the age of the products into consideration. The newer OM System OM-5 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
OM System OM-5 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-M10 IV as a Portrait photography camera
has manual focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
supports RAW files
focusing manually
decent megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
OM System OM-5 Street photography advice
Olympus E-M10 IV Street photography advice
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
provides focus via touch
weather proof
good high ISO (25,600)
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
features focus via touch
good ISO range (25,600)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
OM System OM-5 Sports photography details
Olympus E-M10 IV Sports photography details
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proof
comes with phase detect auto focus
terrible battery pack (310 per charge)
silent shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
OM System OM-5 Travel photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 IV Travel photography highlights
weather proof
has bluetooth
provides focus via touch
good MP (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
terrible battery pack (310 CIPA)
has bluetooth
features focus via touch
decent megapixels (20MP)
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
OM System OM-5 Landscape photography advice
Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography advice
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3.00 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
weather proof
terrible battery pack (310 per charge)
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
OM System OM-5 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-M10 IV Vlogging highlights
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focus
good video quality (4096 x 2160 resolution)
does have external microphone jack
display is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focusing
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does not have microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 IV Specifications
| OM System OM-5 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | OM System OM-5 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2022-10-26 | 2020-08-04 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 119 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.62x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | 8.7 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 414 grams (0.91 lb) | 383 grams (0.84 lb) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 shots | 360 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | BLS-50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $1,200 | $699 |