OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III
80 Imaging
63 Features
88 Overall
73
 
               
              80 Imaging
54 Features
75 Overall
62
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2022
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms        OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
Here is a extended overview of the OM System OM-5 and Olympus E-M10 III, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the OM System OM-5 (20MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe OM System OM-5 was unveiled 5 years later than the E-M10 III and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the OM System OM-5 scores versus the E-M10 III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for OM System OM-5 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The full galleries are viewable at OM System OM-5 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick OM System OM-5 over the Olympus E-M10 III
| OM System OM-5 | E-M10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | October 2022 |  | August 2017 | Fresher by 63 months | 
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | 
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | 
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the OM System OM-5
| E-M10 III | OM System OM-5 | 
|---|
Common features in the OM System OM-5 and Olympus E-M10 III
| OM System OM-5 | E-M10 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen size | 3.00" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing | 
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 1040k | The same screen resolution | 
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate | 
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The OM System OM-5 offers physical measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 III has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
See the OM System OM-5 and Olympus E-M10 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the OM System OM-5 versus the E-M10 III.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the OM System OM-5 and E-M10 III is 80 and 80 respectively.
 
          OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking technical specs. The graphic below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the OM System OM-5 and E-M10 III.
As you can tell, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the OM System OM-5 to give more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent OM System OM-5 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
 
          OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
 
         President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
 Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
 Photography Glossary
Photography Glossary
        
                
        OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
| OM System OM-5 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus | 
| Model type | OM System OM-5 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | 
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless | 
| Launched | 2022-10-26 | 2017-08-31 | 
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII | 
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS | 
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds | 
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm | 
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 226.2mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels | 
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 | 
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 | 
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 | 
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 | 
| RAW pictures | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | 100 | 
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | 121 | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds | 
| Total lenses | 119 | 107 | 
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 | 
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting | 
| Screen diagonal | 3.00 inches | 3 inches | 
| Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic | 
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots | 
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% | 
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.62x | 
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds | 
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds | 
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds | 
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 8.6fps | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes | 
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds | 
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 | 
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 | 
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 414 grams (0.91 pounds) | 410 grams (0.90 pounds) | 
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 photographs | 330 photographs | 
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack | 
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | BLS-50 | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | 
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | 
| Card slots | One | One | 
| Pricing at release | $1,200 | $650 | 



