OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III
80 Imaging
64 Features
88 Overall
73


80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2022
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 IV

OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
Here is a extended overview of the OM System OM-5 and Olympus E-M10 III, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both designed by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the OM System OM-5 (20MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).

The OM System OM-5 was unveiled 5 years later than the E-M10 III and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the OM System OM-5 scores versus the E-M10 III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for OM System OM-5 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The full galleries are viewable at OM System OM-5 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick OM System OM-5 over the Olympus E-M10 III
OM System OM-5 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2022 | ![]() | August 2017 | Fresher by 63 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the OM System OM-5
E-M10 III | OM System OM-5 |
---|
Common features in the OM System OM-5 and Olympus E-M10 III
OM System OM-5 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen size | 3.00" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1040k | The same screen resolution |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The OM System OM-5 offers physical measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 III has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
See the OM System OM-5 and Olympus E-M10 III in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the OM System OM-5 versus the E-M10 III.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the OM System OM-5 and E-M10 III is 80 and 80 respectively.

OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking technical specs. The graphic below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the OM System OM-5 and E-M10 III.
As you can tell, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the OM System OM-5 to give more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more recent OM System OM-5 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

OM System OM-5 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
OM System OM-5 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | OM System OM-5 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2022-10-26 | 2017-08-31 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 119 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 8.6fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 pounds) | 410 grams (0.90 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | 330 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $1,200 | $650 |