OM System OM-5 vs Panasonic G95
Portability
80 Imaging
64 Features
88 Overall
73
80 Imaging
64 Features
88 Overall
73
Portability
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
OM System OM-5 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2022
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5 III
Panasonic G95
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Announced April 2019
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-G90
- Old Model is Panasonic G85
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms OM System OM-5 vs Panasonic G95 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the OM System OM-5 vs Panasonic G95, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the OM System OM-5 (20MP) and the G95 (20.3MP) is relatively close and both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe OM System OM-5 was revealed 3 years after the G95 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the OM System OM-5 grades vs the G95 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary OM System OM-5 vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for OM System OM-5 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The full galleries are available at OM System OM-5 Gallery & Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick OM System OM-5 over the Panasonic G95
| OM System OM-5 | G95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | October 2022 |  | April 2019 | More modern by 44 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the OM System OM-5
| G95 | OM System OM-5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1240k |  | 1040k | Sharper screen (+200k dot) |
Common features in the OM System OM-5 and Panasonic G95
| OM System OM-5 | G95 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3.00" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Both good for selfies | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
OM System OM-5 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The OM System OM-5 provides external dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Panasonic G95 has proportions of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") having a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Compare the OM System OM-5 vs Panasonic G95 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the OM System OM-5 compared to the G95.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the OM System OM-5 and G95 is 80 and 67 respectively.
OM System OM-5 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the OM System OM-5 and G95.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Panasonic G95 to render more detail because of its extra 0.3MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher OM System OM-5 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
OM System OM-5 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
OM System OM-5 Portrait photography details
Panasonic G95 Portrait photography details
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20.3 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focusing
supports RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Street photography with OM System OM-5
Street photography with Panasonic G95
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
boasts focus via touch
environment proofing
very good ISO range (25,600)
screen articulates fully
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
includes touch focus
environment proof
great high ISO (25,600)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
OM System OM-5 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic G95 as a Sports photography camera
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
quiet shooting (1/32,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
environment proofing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
bad battery life (310 shots)
silent mode (1/16,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20.3MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proof
bad battery pack (290 CIPA)
does not have phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
OM System OM-5 Travel photography factors
Panasonic G95 Travel photography factors
environment proofing
has bluetooth
boasts focus via touch
good resolution (20 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
bad battery life (310 CIPA)
environment proof
supports bluetooth
includes touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (20.3MP)
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
bad battery pack (290 shots)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with OM System OM-5
Landscape photography with Panasonic G95
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3.00 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
environment proofing
bad battery life (310 CIPA)
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20.3MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
does not have anti-alias filter
great high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment proof
bad battery pack (290 per charge)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
OM System OM-5 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic G95 as a Vlogging camera
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect autofocus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes mic port
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection focusing
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
has external microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
OM System OM-5 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
| OM System OM-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | OM System OM-5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2022-10-26 | 2019-04-05 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 20.3 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | 64 | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 119 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3.00" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,240k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
| Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/16000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 414 gr (0.91 pounds) | 536 gr (1.18 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 photos | 290 photos |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $1,200 | $998 |