OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
80 Imaging
63 Features
88 Overall
73
69 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Announced October 2022
- Older Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Launched February 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the OM System OM-5 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the OM System OM-5 (20MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the OM System OM-5 (Four Thirds) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe OM System OM-5 was brought out 10 years later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the OM System OM-5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short introduction of how the OM System OM-5 scores vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for OM System OM-5 & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The entire galleries are viewable at OM System OM-5 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick OM System OM-5 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| OM System OM-5 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | October 2022 |  | February 2012 | Fresher by 131 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the OM System OM-5
| GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | OM System OM-5 |
|---|
Common features in the OM System OM-5 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| OM System OM-5 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3.00" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and proportions. The OM System OM-5 has got exterior measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has measurements of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the OM System OM-5 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the OM System OM-5 compared to the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the OM System OM-5 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 80 and 69 respectively.
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the OM System OM-5 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The OM System OM-5 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field tougher and the OM System OM-5 will show extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern OM System OM-5 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
| OM System OM-5 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | OM System OM-5 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2022-10-26 | 2012-02-02 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Number of lenses | 119 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.00 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 414 grams (0.91 lbs) | 550 grams (1.21 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 shots | 400 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $1,200 | $871 |