OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
80 Imaging
64 Features
88 Overall
73
![OM System OM-5 front OM System OM-5 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/OM-System-OM-5/OM-System-OM-5-front.jpg)
![Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-GXR-S10-24-72mm-F2.5-4.4-VC/Ricoh-GXR-S10-24-72mm-F2.5-4.4-VC-front.jpg)
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Announced October 2022
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Announced March 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the OM System OM-5 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the OM System OM-5 (20MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the OM System OM-5 (Four Thirds) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The OM System OM-5 was brought out 12 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the OM System OM-5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the OM System OM-5 grades versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for OM System OM-5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The entire galleries are available at OM System OM-5 Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick OM System OM-5 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
OM System OM-5 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2022 | ![]() | March 2010 | Newer by 154 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+120k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the OM System OM-5
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | OM System OM-5 |
---|
Common features in the OM System OM-5 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
OM System OM-5 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3.00" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera, you have to consider its weight and size. The OM System OM-5 comes with outer dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Examine the OM System OM-5 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the OM System OM-5 and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
![OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/OM-System-OM-5-vs-Ricoh-GXR-S10-24-72mm-F2.5-4.4-VC-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the OM System OM-5 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 80 and 85 respectively.
![OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/OM-System-OM-5-vs-Ricoh-GXR-S10-24-72mm-F2.5-4.4-VC-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking specifications. The image here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the OM System OM-5 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The OM System OM-5 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the OM System OM-5 will give you greater detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent OM System OM-5 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
![OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/OM-System-OM-5-vs-Ricoh-GXR-S10-24-72mm-F2.5-4.4-VC-sensor-size-comparison.png)
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
![OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/OM-System-OM-5-vs-Ricoh-GXR-S10-24-72mm-F2.5-4.4-VC-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
OM System OM-5 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
OM System OM-5 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | OM System OM-5 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2022-10-26 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 119 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.00 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 lb) | 355 gr (0.78 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 photographs | 410 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $1,200 | $349 |