OM System OM-5 vs Sigma Quattro H
80 Imaging
63 Features
88 Overall
73


78 Imaging
72 Features
59 Overall
66
OM System OM-5 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Released October 2022
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016

OM System OM-5 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the OM System OM-5 vs Sigma Quattro H, both Advanced Mirrorless cameras by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the OM System OM-5 (20MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the OM System OM-5 (Four Thirds) and Quattro H (APS-H) come with totally different sensor measurements.

The OM System OM-5 was released 6 years after the Quattro H which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the OM System OM-5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the OM System OM-5 matches up vs the Quattro H in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

OM System OM-5 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for OM System OM-5 & Sigma sd Quattro H. The complete galleries are available at OM System OM-5 Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick OM System OM-5 over the Sigma Quattro H
OM System OM-5 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2022 | ![]() | February 2016 | More modern by 82 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the OM System OM-5
Quattro H | OM System OM-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1620k | ![]() | 1040k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
Common features in the OM System OM-5 and Sigma Quattro H
OM System OM-5 | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3.00" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
OM System OM-5 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The OM System OM-5 enjoys physical measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro H has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Take a look at the OM System OM-5 vs Sigma Quattro H in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view size comparison of the OM System OM-5 versus the Quattro H.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the OM System OM-5 and Quattro H is 80 and 78 respectively.

OM System OM-5 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out specifications. The picture below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the OM System OM-5 and Quattro H.
Plainly, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The OM System OM-5 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Sigma Quattro H will produce more detail as a result of its extra 25MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The newer OM System OM-5 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

OM System OM-5 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

OM System OM-5 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
OM System OM-5 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | OM System OM-5 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2022-10-26 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-H |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 45 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 6200 x 4152 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
Total lenses | 119 | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,620k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per second | 3.8 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | - |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 shots | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $1,200 | $1,134 |