Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-500
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
70 Imaging
41 Features
34 Overall
38
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Revealed November 2003
- Successor is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 479g - 130 x 95 x 66mm
- Released October 2005
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-500
- Refreshed by Olympus E-510
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-500 Overview
Here is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-1 versus Olympus E-500, former being a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Advanced DSLR and both of them are sold by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and E-500 (8MP) but they use the same exact sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-1 was brought out 23 months prior to the E-500 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus E-500 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-1 grades against the E-500 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-1 & Olympus E-500. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Olympus E-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus E-500
| E-1 | E-500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-500 over the Olympus E-1
| E-500 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | October 2005 |  | November 2003 | Fresher by 23 months |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
| Screen resolution | 215k |  | 134k | Clearer screen (+81k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus E-500
| E-1 | E-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-1 has external dimensions of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) and the Olympus E-500 has sizing of 130mm x 95mm x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 479 grams (1.06 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-1 versus Olympus E-500 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-1 vs the E-500.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-1 and E-500 is 59 and 70 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizing simply by viewing technical specs. The visual below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-1 and E-500.
As you have seen, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus E-500 to render greater detail having its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-1 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-500 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Olympus E-500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-1 | Olympus E-500 |
| Otherwise known as | - | EVOLT E-500 |
| Class | Pro DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Revealed | 2003-11-29 | 2005-10-21 |
| Body design | Large SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 8 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 3264 x 2448 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 400 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Total lenses | 45 | 45 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 1.8 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 215 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.45x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | None |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 735 grams (1.62 pounds) | 479 grams (1.06 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 130 x 95 x 66mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $1,700 | $600 |