Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
![Olympus E-1 front Olympus E-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Olympus-E-1-ek-fs.jpg)
![Olympus OM-D E-M10 front Olympus OM-D E-M10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-OM-D-E-M10/Olympus-E-M10-front.jpg)
82 Imaging
53 Features
73 Overall
61
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Revealed November 2003
- Newer Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 396g - 119 x 82 x 46mm
- Launched March 2014
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 II
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10, former being a Pro DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are produced by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and E-M10 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (Four Thirds).
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The E-1 was brought out 11 years earlier than the E-M10 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-1 matches up vs the E-M10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-1 & Olympus OM-D E-M10. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus E-M10
E-1 | E-M10 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 over the Olympus E-1
E-M10 | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2014 | ![]() | November 2003 | Fresher by 125 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper display (+903k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus E-M10
E-1 | E-M10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-1 has exterior dimensions of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 has proportions of 119mm x 82mm x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") and a weight of 396 grams (0.87 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-1 vs the E-M10.
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-1 and E-M10 is 59 and 82 respectively.
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor sizing purely by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-1 and E-M10.
To sum up, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Olympus E-M10 to show greater detail having its extra 11MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The older E-1 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus E-M10 Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-1 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 |
Class | Pro DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2003-11-29 | 2014-03-18 |
Body design | Large SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 1.8" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 134k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.58x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m (ISO100) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual(1/1(FULL)~1/64) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 735 gr (1.62 pounds) | 396 gr (0.87 pounds) |
Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 119 x 82 x 46mm (4.7" x 3.2" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 884 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec.,custom (Waiting time 1-30sec.,Shooting interval 0.5/1/2/3sec.,Number of shots 1-10)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $600 |