Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
![Olympus E-1 front Olympus E-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Olympus-E-1-ek-fs.jpg)
![Olympus Stylus SH-1 front Olympus Stylus SH-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-SH-1/Olympus-SH-1-front.jpg)
88 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Released November 2003
- Replacement is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-2
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus E-1 and Olympus SH-1, one being a Pro DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are built by Olympus. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and SH-1 (16MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and SH-1 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The E-1 was launched 11 years earlier than the SH-1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus SH-1 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-1 matches up against the SH-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-1 and Olympus Stylus SH-1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Olympus SH-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus SH-1
E-1 | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-1 over the Olympus E-1
SH-1 | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | March 2014 | ![]() | November 2003 | Fresher by 125 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper screen (+326k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus SH-1
E-1 | SH-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-1 has outside dimensions of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) and the Olympus SH-1 has sizing of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-1 and Olympus SH-1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-1 compared to the SH-1.
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1 size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-1-size-comparison.jpg)
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-1 and SH-1 is 59 and 88 respectively.
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by looking through specifications. The photograph below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-1 and SH-1.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-1 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus SH-1 will render more detail utilizing its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-Stylus-SH-1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus SH-1 Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-1 | Olympus Stylus SH-1 |
Category | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2003-11-29 | 2014-03-31 |
Physical type | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 735 grams (1.62 pounds) | 271 grams (0.60 pounds) |
Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $349 |