Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a1e6/7a1e6351c25f5c151d32d2a46c675db34ce73c7e" alt="Olympus E-1 front Olympus E-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2003
- Successor is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Pro DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and Tough-3000 (12MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-1 was released 7 years prior to the Tough-3000 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-1 grades vs the Tough-3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-1 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-1 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-1
Tough-3000 | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | ![]() | November 2003 | More recent by 74 months |
Display sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-1 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-1 enjoys external dimensions of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) while the Olympus Tough-3000 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-1 and the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56a23/56a237ee9ab9456683f4621db0eba88dfd2130a0" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-1 and Tough-3000 is 59 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51d57/51d57e081ce3508de43e827f54b47510fa3a0a59" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-1 and Tough-3000.
As you can see, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-1 due to its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus Tough-3000 will provide more detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics far more aggressively. The older E-1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc345/bc345dcba89b814c2887f09a39450b857dc41108" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/168a3/168a3cd6be25454761f055e38988bf94a06b793f" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-1 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also Known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Class | Pro DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2003-11-29 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 2cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 735 gr (1.62 pounds) | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $0 |