Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-860
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
91 Imaging
41 Features
42 Overall
41
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Revealed November 2003
- Replacement is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-870
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-1 and Olympus TG-860, former is a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-1 was unveiled 12 years prior to the TG-860 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-1 scores versus the TG-860 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-1 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus TG-860
| E-1 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-1
| TG-860 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2015 |  | November 2003 | More modern by 136 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 134k | Clearer screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus TG-860
| E-1 | TG-860 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-1 comes with external measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-1 and Olympus TG-860 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-1 compared to the TG-860.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-1 and TG-860 is 59 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-1 and TG-860.
As you can see, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-1 having a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-860 will offer extra detail having an extra 11MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged E-1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
| Category | Pro DSLR | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2003-11-29 | 2015-02-06 |
| Physical type | Large SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 1.8" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 134k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Yes |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 735g (1.62 lb) | 224g (0.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $1,700 | $279 |