Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a1e6/7a1e6351c25f5c151d32d2a46c675db34ce73c7e" alt="Olympus E-1 front Olympus E-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de436/de436c1d22864ee65c1aad5da965732699f4570f" alt="Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2003
- Successor is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-1 versus Olympus TG-310, former is a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and TG-310 (14MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and TG-310 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-1 was revealed 8 years earlier than the TG-310 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus TG-310 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-1 matches up versus the TG-310 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-1 & Olympus TG-310. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus TG-310
E-1 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Olympus E-1
TG-310 | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | November 2003 | More modern by 86 months |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus TG-310
E-1 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-1 comes with exterior dimensions of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") along with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-1 versus Olympus TG-310 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-1 against the TG-310.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cae05/cae05f8960d63ca56286a21e9ee8d5670acbfa8f" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-1 and TG-310 is 59 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d05f/7d05f3787fc120f157aea09c5dde2aeb00c4afc8" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through a spec sheet. The picture underneath should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-1 and TG-310.
As you can see, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-1 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-310 will give more detail because of its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The more aged E-1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c325c/c325c691d72074828f0be7e4b265768a5b86f9b3" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e781/8e781eff062f0540810c5abc94f9460741feea77" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Olympus TG-310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-1 | Olympus TG-310 |
Class | Pro DSLR | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2003-11-29 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Max resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 134k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 735g (1.62 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 150 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $1,700 | $0 |