Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
![Olympus E-1 front Olympus E-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Olympus-E-1-ek-fs.jpg)
![Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-TG-830-iHS/Olympus-TG-830-iHS-front.jpg)
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Announced November 2003
- Refreshed by Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-1 and Olympus TG-830 iHS, one being a Pro DSLR and the latter is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The E-1 was unveiled 10 years before the TG-830 iHS and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-1 matches up against the TG-830 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-1 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-1 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-1
TG-830 iHS | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | November 2003 | Fresher by 110 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-1 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-1 has got outer dimensions of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-1 and Olympus TG-830 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-1 and the TG-830 iHS.
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-TG-830-iHS-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-1 and TG-830 iHS is 59 and 91 respectively.
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-TG-830-iHS-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing specs. The photograph below might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-1 and TG-830 iHS.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-1 having a bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will result in greater detail having an extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-1 will be behind in sensor innovation.
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-TG-830-iHS-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Olympus-TG-830-iHS-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-1 | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Type | Pro DSLR | Waterproof |
Announced | 2003-11-29 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 134k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 735 grams (1.62 lbs) | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $0 |