Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-3
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Launched November 2003
- Renewed by Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus TG-4
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-1 and Olympus TG-3, one is a Pro DSLR and the other is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and TG-3 (16MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and TG-3 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-1 was launched 11 years prior to the TG-3 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-1 grades against the TG-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-1 and Olympus Tough TG-3. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus TG-3
| E-1 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Olympus E-1
| TG-3 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | November 2003 | Newer by 125 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 134k | Clearer display (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus TG-3
| E-1 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-1 comes with exterior measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) and the Olympus TG-3 has specifications of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-1 and Olympus TG-3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-1 versus the TG-3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-1 and TG-3 is 59 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading through technical specs. The image below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-1 and TG-3.
As you can tell, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-1 featuring a larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus TG-3 will resolve greater detail utilizing its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-1 | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Class | Pro DSLR | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2003-11-29 | 2014-03-31 |
| Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.8" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 134k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 735g (1.62 lbs) | 247g (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $1,700 | $350 |
