Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VH-410
59 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2003
- Updated by Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Released August 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VH-410, former being a Pro DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and VH-410 (16MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and VH-410 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-1 was unveiled 9 years prior to the VH-410 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus VH-410 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-1 grades versus the VH-410 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-1 & Olympus VH-410. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus VH-410
| E-1 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Olympus E-1
| VH-410 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 | November 2003 | More recent by 106 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 134k | Crisper display (+326k dot) | |
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus VH-410
| E-1 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-1 has got outside measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) and the Olympus VH-410 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VH-410 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-1 versus the VH-410.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-1 and VH-410 is 59 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by going through specifications. The photograph here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-1 and VH-410.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-1 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus VH-410 will provide greater detail having an extra 11MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos more aggressively. The older E-1 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Olympus VH-410 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus E-1 | Olympus VH-410 |
| Category | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2003-11-29 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Large SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 134 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 735 gr (1.62 lbs) | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $1,700 | $186 |