Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a1e6/7a1e6351c25f5c151d32d2a46c675db34ce73c7e" alt="Olympus E-1 front Olympus E-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Released November 2003
- New Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-1 and Olympus VR-320, one being a Pro DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and VR-320 (14MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-1 was released 8 years earlier than the VR-320 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-1 grades versus the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-1 and Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus VR-320
E-1 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-1
VR-320 | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | November 2003 | More recent by 92 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus VR-320
E-1 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch display |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-1 offers outside measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") and a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-1 and Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-1 and the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ef91/3ef91819eca509cb42b656acd386d2c7cf9d0053" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-1 and VR-320 is 59 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5407c/5407c1bf64750f82ce020131d599fdadec1b5e19" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The visual here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and VR-320.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-1 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus VR-320 will produce more detail as a result of its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The older E-1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0cc8f/0cc8fae4c13d4ce80c7454bfcdf6f5374f1efc7c" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5e3c/f5e3c6a0e3740aed563ce786985b773cfa1dd4b4" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-1 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2003-11-29 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 735g (1.62 pounds) | 158g (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $1,700 | $179 |