Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Released November 2003
- Renewed by Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Released December 2012
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-1 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-1 was launched 10 years before the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-1 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-1 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-1 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-1
XZ-2 iHS | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | December 2012 | November 2003 | Fresher by 110 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 134k | Clearer screen (+786k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-1 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-1 provides outside measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-1 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-1 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-1 and XZ-2 iHS is 59 and 85 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The photograph here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-1 and XZ-2 iHS.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-1 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-1 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Type | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2003-11-29 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 735 grams (1.62 lbs) | 346 grams (0.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $1,700 | $450 |