Clicky

Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
59
Imaging
38
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus E-1 front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-1
(Full Review)
  • 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
  • Released November 2003
  • Renewed by Olympus E-3
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Released December 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-1 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-1 was launched 10 years before the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before going through a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-1 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-1 XZ-2 iHS 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-1

 XZ-2 iHS E-1 
ReleasedDecember 2012November 2003Fresher by 110 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimension3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution920k134kClearer screen (+786k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-1 XZ-2 iHS 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-1 provides outside measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-1 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-1 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.

Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-1 and XZ-2 iHS is 59 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The photograph here will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-1 and XZ-2 iHS.

To sum up, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-1 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The older E-1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-1 Portrait photography info
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography info
46
manual focus
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
does not have liveview
low resolution (5 megapixels)
46
you can focus manually
comes with face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-1
Street photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
57
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
weather proof
lighter than competitors (735 grams)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
66
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
more heavy than average in class (346g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-1 Sports photography info
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography info
40
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
weather proof
comes with phase detect AF
does not have liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (5 megapixels)
43
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
good battery life (340 CIPA)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-1 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Travel photography camera
47
lighter than competitors (735 grams)
weather proof
missing Time Lapse function
low resolution (5 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
61
good battery life (340 shots)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
does not have Timelapse mode
more heavy than average in class (346 grams)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-1 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography highlights
46
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
weather proof
tiny screen (1.8")
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (5 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse function
55
you can focus manually
pretty wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (340 per charge)
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
does not have Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-1 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Vlogging camera
9
lack of video recording
36
pretty wide (28mm)
good maximum aperture (f1.8)
built-in touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have microphone jack
screen is not selfie friendly
more heavy than average in class (346g)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-1 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Olympus E-1Olympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-1 Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Type Pro DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Released 2003-11-29 2012-12-18
Body design Large SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 5 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 2560 x 1920 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 3200 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 3 35
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 1.8 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 134 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 735 grams (1.62 lbs) 346 grams (0.76 lbs)
Dimensions 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 49
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 216
Other
Battery life - 340 photos
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID - Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $1,700 $450