Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a1e6/7a1e6351c25f5c151d32d2a46c675db34ce73c7e" alt="Olympus E-1 front Olympus E-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Announced November 2003
- Renewed by Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Raise to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Introduced April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Olympus E-1 and Panasonic FS42, one is a Pro DSLR and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") posses totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-1 was manufactured 6 years before the FS42 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-1 scores against the FS42 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Panasonic FS42
E-1 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-1
FS42 | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | April 2009 | ![]() | November 2003 | Newer by 65 months |
Screen size | 2.5" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Panasonic FS42
E-1 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-1 offers physical dimensions of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") and a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has dimensions of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-1 and Panasonic FS42 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-1 and the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abd23/abd23b4146567912d0f19963f3f65afb034c0095" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-1 and FS42 is 59 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e907/4e9073860da07b18b8dd9a137c826ca0964a1330" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-1 and FS42.
Clearly, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-1 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FS42 will offer you more detail due to its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd221/dd221e432c77c63ae90a0b1b5f8025d1a29346bd" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9edee/9edee3f8606a264e3bb2436eaed404639b97af63" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus E-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Type | Pro DSLR | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2003-11-29 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Large SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8" | 2.5" |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 735 grams (1.62 pounds) | 132 grams (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $580 |