Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FX75
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Launched November 2003
- New Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Announced June 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FX70
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus E-1 versus Panasonic FX75, one is a Pro DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-1 was brought out 7 years earlier than the FX75 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the E-1 matches up versus the FX75 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Panasonic FX75
E-1 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-1
FX75 | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2010 | November 2003 | More modern by 79 months | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 134k | Sharper screen (+96k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Panasonic FX75
E-1 | FX75 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-1 has got external measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has proportions of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-1 versus Panasonic FX75 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the E-1 against the FX75.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-1 and FX75 is 59 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes simply by going over a spec sheet. The pic here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and FX75.
Clearly, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-1 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Panasonic FX75 will offer extra detail having its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more aged E-1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
Category | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2003-11-29 | 2010-06-01 |
Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 735 gr (1.62 lb) | 165 gr (0.36 lb) |
Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $1,700 | $139 |