Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a1e6/7a1e6351c25f5c151d32d2a46c675db34ce73c7e" alt="Olympus E-1 front Olympus E-1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0f26/a0f260975b7fd3cfd965df18bc5d1244f1cf70fb" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
57 Overall
45
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2003
- Replacement is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 243g - 111 x 65 x 34mm
- Released January 2015
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ70
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS45
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50, one is a Pro DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and ZS50 (12MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and ZS50 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-1 was released 12 years prior to the ZS50 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS50 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-1 matches up vs the ZS50 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Panasonic ZS50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Panasonic ZS50
E-1 | ZS50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS50 over the Olympus E-1
ZS50 | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2015 | ![]() | November 2003 | More modern by 135 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 134k | Clearer display (+906k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Panasonic ZS50
E-1 | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-1 provides outer dimensions of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") and a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS50 has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-1 versus the ZS50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b9cb/8b9cbd445d890e75285ad35e69f01cf6087dcf92" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-1 and ZS50 is 59 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5c38b/5c38b9d42619131391c630452f782b92cf49dbf2" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to see the gap between sensor sizes just by checking specifications. The image underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-1 and ZS50.
Plainly, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-1 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic ZS50 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged E-1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f93b5/f93b52fe5b327714aca51751ae3647c6d9339c48" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 sensor size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/824d6/824d6b62d944389ab9f0c37675e4c09dc6bb58fc" alt="Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-1 vs Panasonic ZS50 Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ70 |
Class | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2003-11-29 | 2015-01-06 |
Physical type | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 134k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 735 grams (1.62 lb) | 243 grams (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 111 x 65 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 44 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 138 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $1,700 | $350 |