Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh CX3
59 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Launched November 2003
- New Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched June 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-1 and Ricoh CX3, one being a Pro DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and CX3 (10MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and CX3 (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-1 was released 7 years before the CX3 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-1 matches up versus the CX3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-1 and Ricoh CX3. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Ricoh CX3
| E-1 | CX3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Olympus E-1
| CX3 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2010 |  | November 2003 | More recent by 79 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 134k | Sharper screen (+786k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Ricoh CX3
| E-1 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-1 offers physical dimensions of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") along with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-1 and Ricoh CX3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-1 against the CX3.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-1 and CX3 is 59 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-1 and CX3.
All in all, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-1 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Ricoh CX3 will provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older E-1 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus E-1 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Class | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2003-11-29 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Large SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 134k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 735 gr (1.62 lbs) | 206 gr (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $1,700 | $329 |