Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II
59 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36


89 Imaging
58 Features
55 Overall
56
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Launched November 2003
- Replacement is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
- 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
- Launched June 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh GR

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II, former is a Pro DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and GR II (16MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and GR II (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.

The E-1 was revealed 12 years prior to the GR II which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-1 grades against the GR II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-1 & Ricoh GR II. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Ricoh GR II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Ricoh GR II
E-1 | GR II |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus E-1
GR II | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2015 | ![]() | November 2003 | Newer by 140 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") |
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper display (+1096k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Ricoh GR II
E-1 | GR II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-1 provides physical measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) while the Ricoh GR II has proportions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-1 against the GR II.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-1 and GR II is 59 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The pic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and GR II.
All in all, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-1 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GR II will render extra detail because of its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged E-1 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Ricoh GR II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus E-1 | Ricoh GR II |
Class | Pro DSLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2003-11-29 | 2015-06-17 |
Body design | Large SLR | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR Engine V |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-16.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 1.8 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 134k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 300 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 735 grams (1.62 lbs) | 251 grams (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1078 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB-65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $1,700 | $599 |