Clicky

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II

Portability
59
Imaging
37
Features
36
Overall
36
Olympus E-1 front
 
Ricoh GR II front
Portability
89
Imaging
58
Features
55
Overall
56

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II Key Specs

Olympus E-1
(Full Review)
  • 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
  • Launched November 2003
  • Replacement is Olympus E-3
Ricoh GR II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8-16.0) lens
  • 251g - 117 x 63 x 35mm
  • Launched June 2015
  • Superseded the Ricoh GR
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II Overview

The following is a complete comparison of the Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II, former is a Pro DSLR while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and GR II (16MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and GR II (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-1 was revealed 12 years prior to the GR II which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Ricoh GR II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-1 grades against the GR II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Ricoh GR II

 E-1 GR II 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR II over the Olympus E-1

 GR II E-1 
LaunchedJune 2015November 2003Newer by 140 months
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution1230k134kSharper display (+1096k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Ricoh GR II

 E-1 GR II 
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-1 provides physical measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) while the Ricoh GR II has proportions of 117mm x 63mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 251 grams (0.55 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-1 against the GR II.

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-1 and GR II is 59 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The pic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and GR II.

All in all, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-1 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Ricoh GR II will render extra detail because of its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged E-1 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-1 Portrait photography information
Ricoh GR II Portrait photography information
46
focusing manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
megapixel count low (5MP)
74
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
features face detection focus
exports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-1
Street photography with Ricoh GR II
57
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
weather proof
lighter than others (735g)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
74
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lighter than others in class (251g)
very good ISO range (25,600)
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-1
Sports photography with Ricoh GR II
39
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
weather proof
sensor has phase detect AF
no liveview
max frames per second low (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (5MP)
50
good resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
features tracking autofocus
focal length is fixed (28mm)
slow fps (4.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-1 Travel photography information
Ricoh GR II Travel photography information
47
lighter than others (735 grams)
weather proof
no Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (5MP)
display is not selfie friendly
67
lighter than others in class (251g)
good resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-1 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GR II Landscape photography advice
45
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
weather proof
screen is somewhat small (1.8")
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (5 megapixels)
no Time Lapse mode
59
you can focus manually
screen size is good (3")
good resolution (16MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
does not have Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-1 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GR II as a Vlogging camera
9
can't record video
32
features face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (251 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
does not have external microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GR II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-1 and Ricoh GR II
 Olympus E-1Ricoh GR II
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus E-1 Ricoh GR II
Class Pro DSLR Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2003-11-29 2015-06-17
Body design Large SLR Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - GR Engine V
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 5MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 2560 x 1920 4928 x 3264
Max native ISO 3200 25600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-16.0
Macro focus distance - 10cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 1.8 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 134k dot 1,230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentaprism) Optical (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 300 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.00 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Flash On, Flash Synchro., Manual Flash, Red-Eye Flash Auto, Red-Eye Flash On, Red-Eye Flash Synchro, Wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p, 24p)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 735 grams (1.62 lbs) 251 grams (0.55 lbs)
Dimensions 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") 117 x 63 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 80
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.7
DXO Low light score not tested 1078
Other
Battery life - 320 shots
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model - DB-65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $1,700 $599