Clicky

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Portability
59
Imaging
38
Features
36
Overall
37
Olympus E-1 front
 
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro front
Portability
77
Imaging
52
Features
31
Overall
43

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

Olympus E-1
(Full Review)
  • 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
  • Revealed November 2003
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-3
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 50mm (F2.5) lens
  • 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
  • Launched November 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview

Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-1 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) boast different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-1 was brought out 7 years before the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-1 scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 E-1 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-1

 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro E-1 
LaunchedNovember 2009November 2003Fresher by 72 months
Screen size3"1.8"Bigger screen (+1.2")
Screen resolution920k134kCrisper screen (+786k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

 E-1 GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-1 features outside measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") along with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-1 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-1 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-1 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 59 and 77 respectively.

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison

Usually, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-1 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will offer more detail having its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older E-1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-1 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Portrait photography highlights
46
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no liveview
MP count low (5 megapixels)
55
focusing manually
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no liveview feature
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-1
Street photography with Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
57
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
weather proofing
lighter than average in class (735 grams)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
62
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-1 Sports photography information
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sports photography information
40
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
weather proofing
supports phase detect auto focus
no liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (5 megapixels)
32
nice sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (50mm)
no liveview feature
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
not so great battery pack (320 shots)
lacks phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-1 Travel photography information
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Travel photography information
47
lighter than average in class (735 grams)
weather proofing
lack of Timelapse function
MP count low (5 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
49
has built in flash
not so great battery pack (320 shots)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-1 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Landscape photography highlights
46
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
weather proofing
small screen (1.8 inches)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (5 megapixels)
lack of Timelapse function
46
focusing manually
pretty good screen size (3")
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (50mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview feature
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
not so great battery pack (320 per charge)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-1 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro as a Vlogging camera
9
lack of video recording
20
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-1 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
 Olympus E-1Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus E-1 Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Type Pro DSLR Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2003-11-29 2009-11-10
Body design Large SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - GR engine III
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 5 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 2560 x 1920 4288 x 2848
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 50mm (1x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.5
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Total lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 1.8 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 134 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentaprism) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.48x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 180 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/3200 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 735g (1.62 lbs) 453g (1.00 lbs)
Physical dimensions 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 320 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $1,700 $566