Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Revealed November 2003
- Newer Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-1 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-1 was brought out 7 years before the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-1 scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-1 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-1 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-1
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2009 | November 2003 | Fresher by 72 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 134k | Crisper screen (+786k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-1 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-1 features outside measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") along with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-1 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-1 vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-1 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 59 and 77 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing simply by reading a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-1 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro will offer more detail having its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older E-1 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus E-1 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Type | Pro DSLR | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2003-11-29 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Large SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 134 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 180 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 735g (1.62 lbs) | 453g (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $1,700 | $566 |