Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-20
59 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Revealed November 2003
- Newer Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-1 and Ricoh WG-20, former is a Pro DSLR while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and WG-20 (14MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and WG-20 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-1 was revealed 11 years earlier than the WG-20 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-1 grades versus the WG-20 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-1 & Ricoh WG-20. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Ricoh WG-20
| E-1 | WG-20 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Olympus E-1
| WG-20 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | November 2003 | More modern by 124 months | |
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Crisper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Ricoh WG-20
| E-1 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-1 enjoys outer measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-20 has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-1 and Ricoh WG-20 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-1 compared to the WG-20.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-1 and WG-20 is 59 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The picture here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and WG-20.
To sum up, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-1 using its larger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Ricoh WG-20 will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-1 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus E-1 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Type | Pro DSLR | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2003-11-29 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.8 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 134 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 735g (1.62 lb) | 164g (0.36 lb) |
| Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 260 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $1,700 | $370 |