Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-4
59 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Launched November 2003
- Updated by Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
Photography Glossary Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-1 versus Ricoh WG-4, one being a Pro DSLR and the other is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and WG-4 (16MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and WG-4 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-1 was released 11 years before the WG-4 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-1 grades against the WG-4 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-1 and Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Ricoh WG-4
| E-1 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus E-1
| WG-4 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 | November 2003 | Fresher by 124 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 134k | Clearer display (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Ricoh WG-4
| E-1 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-1 comes with external measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-1 versus Ricoh WG-4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-1 versus the WG-4.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-1 and WG-4 is 59 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-1 and WG-4.
As you can tell, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-1 featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh WG-4 will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos way more aggressively. The older E-1 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-1 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus E-1 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Pro DSLR | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2003-11-29 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 735g (1.62 pounds) | 230g (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $1,700 | $330 |