Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
![Olympus E-1 front Olympus E-1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Olympus-E-1-ek-fs.jpg)
![Samsung DV150F front Samsung DV150F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-DV150F/Samsung-DV150F-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
40 Features
29 Overall
35
Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Released November 2003
- New Model is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
- Released January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F, one being a Pro DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and DV150F (16MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and DV150F (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The E-1 was brought out 10 years prior to the DV150F and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Samsung DV150F being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-1 grades versus the DV150F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/greggs-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-1 and Samsung DV150F. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Samsung DV150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Samsung DV150F
E-1 | DV150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Olympus E-1
DV150F | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | November 2003 | Fresher by 110 months |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper screen (+326k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Samsung DV150F
E-1 | DV150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-1 has got physical measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") along with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) and the Samsung DV150F has proportions of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-1 versus the DV150F.
![Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Samsung-DV150F-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-1 and DV150F is 59 and 96 respectively.
![Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F top view buttons comparison Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Samsung-DV150F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizing purely by going through specifications. The graphic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and DV150F.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-1 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung DV150F will produce extra detail having its extra 11MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The older E-1 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
![Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F sensor size comparison Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Samsung-DV150F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-E-1-vs-Samsung-DV150F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-1 vs Samsung DV150F Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Samsung DV150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus E-1 | Samsung DV150F |
Category | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2003-11-29 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | Large SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.5-6.3 |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 735 gr (1.62 lbs) | 116 gr (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $1,700 | $150 |