Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200
59 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2003
- Updated by Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- Replacement is Sony A230
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-1 and Sony A200, former is a Pro DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and A200 (10MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and A200 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-1 was launched 5 years prior to the A200 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-1 scores versus the A200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-1 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Sony A200
| E-1 | A200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus E-1
| A200 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2008 | November 2003 | Newer by 56 months | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Sharper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Sony A200
| E-1 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-1 features outer measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-1 and Sony A200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-1 vs the A200.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-1 and A200 is 59 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and A200.
As you can see, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-1 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A200 will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Category | Pro DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2003-11-29 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Large SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Number of lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | None |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 735g (1.62 lb) | 572g (1.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $1,700 | $100 |