Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200
59 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
66 Imaging
49 Features
38 Overall
44
Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2003
- Updated by Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
- Released July 2008
- Replacement is Sony A230
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-1 and Sony A200, former is a Pro DSLR while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and A200 (10MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and A200 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-1 was launched 5 years prior to the A200 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-1 scores versus the A200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-1 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Sony A200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Sony A200
| E-1 | A200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus E-1
| A200 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | July 2008 | November 2003 | Newer by 56 months | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 1.8" | Larger display (+0.9") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Sharper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Sony A200
| E-1 | A200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-1 features outer measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has measurements of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-1 and Sony A200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-1 vs the A200.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-1 and A200 is 59 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by looking through a spec sheet. The picture below might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and A200.
As you can see, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-1 because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Sony A200 will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-1 vs Sony A200 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-1 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 |
| Category | Pro DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2003-11-29 | 2008-07-17 |
| Physical type | Large SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Number of lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | None |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 735g (1.62 lb) | 572g (1.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 63 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.3 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 521 |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Compact Flash |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $1,700 | $100 |