Olympus E-1 vs Sony RX10 IV
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37


52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Olympus E-1 vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Revealed November 2003
- Replacement is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched September 2017
- Succeeded the Sony RX10 III

Olympus E-1 vs Sony RX10 IV: The Ultimate Cross-Generational Showdown
Comparing cameras from different eras is always a fascinating exercise - a bit like pitting a classic sports car against a modern supercar. Each embodies the spirit and technology of its time, and both can shine splendidly depending on the road (or photographic scenario) in front of them. Today, I put the Olympus E-1 (a venerable professional DSLR from 2003) head-to-head against the more recent 2017 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV, a large-sensor superzoom bridge camera. At first glance, these cameras seem destined for very different users, but a closer inspection reveals surprising insights about the evolution of camera technology and how old meets new.
So, buckle up as we take a deep dive into sensor tech, autofocus wizardry, ergonomics, and shooting versatility across photography disciplines, helping you decide which camera - if either - is right for your photographic adventure. Whether you’re a retro DSLR fan, a travel-friendly specialist, or just plain curious, I’ve tested both extensively to bring you the facts, the foibles, and the fun.
Seeing Eye to Eye: Size and Handling Differences
When handling cameras, feel, weight distribution, and control layout play out like a tactile conversation between you and your gear. The Olympus E-1 is a large SLR body, classic and substantial, while the RX10 IV wears a bridge camera suit, packed with technology but aiming for compact versatility.
At 735 grams with dimensions approximately 141x104x81 mm, the E-1 feels robust but manageable. It’s hefty by today’s mirrorless standards (or even many DSLRs), embodying that early 2000s professional body philosophy - solid, dependable, a bit like a camera tank. The Sony RX10 IV tips the scales at about 1,095 grams with bulkier dimensions (133x94x145 mm). Its SLR-like shape extends lengthwise due to the fixed 24-600mm lens, and while it’s heavier, the ergonomic handgrip and button layout attempt to balance that extra pound comfortably.
Speaking from years of testing, the E-1's traditional DSLR ergonomics will appeal to those who prefer dedicated dials and a no-nonsense grip. On the other hand, the RX10 IV sacrifices some pocketability for all-inclusive zoom versatility, yet its controls remain accessible for quick grabs during spontaneous shooting sessions.
A Peek From Above: Control Layout and Top Panel Features
The devil is in the details, especially when repeatedly adjusting settings under different shooting circumstances. The Olympus E-1 sticks to classic DSLR controls - physical exposure dials, aperture and shutter priority modes, and no frills on live-view or touchscreen functions. It’s a pure analog-to-digital hybrid experience.
Flipping over to the RX10 IV, you find a more complex but intuitive set of controls: a larger mode dial, dedicated video recording buttons, AF mode selectors, and customizable function keys. The touchscreen interface adds another layer of interaction, notably missing from the E-1. It's the kind of ergonomic advancement that feels natural to photographers who are no strangers to smartphones and tablets but may strike purists as overkill.
To sum it up: The E-1 is a straightforward, rugged operator’s camera with no distractions, whereas the RX10 IV is feature-rich and versatile, catering to fast-paced, multimedia-driven workflows.
Size Matters: Sensor Technology and Image Quality
Arguably the most critical foundation of any camera’s imaging prowess is its sensor - a sweet spot where technology, physics, and optics collide. Here's where the two cameras diverge quite sharply.
The Olympus E-1 packs a Four Thirds 17.3x13mm CCD sensor with a resolution of 5 megapixels (2560x1920). CCD sensors, common in the early 2000s, excelled in highlight roll-off and color rendition, but they tend to have higher noise at elevated ISO levels. The limited pixel count and smaller sensor area (around 225 mm²) reflect the era’s constraints but also a focus on delivering sharp, clean images under controlled lighting.
In contrast, the Sony RX10 IV sports a cutting-edge 1-inch 13.2x8.8mm backside-illuminated CMOS sensor with an impressive 20 megapixels (5472x3648). The BSI-CMOS design provides significant gains in high ISO performance, dynamic range, and readout speed. The sensor’s roughly 116 mm² area isn’t huge by modern full-frame standards, but paired with Sony’s advanced Bionz X processor, the image quality surpasses many larger sensors in sheer practical use, especially given the broader zoom reach.
While the Olympus’s CCD sensor renders pleasant colors and decent detail for early digital standards, its low pixel count and noise levels limit its utility in any demanding light situation or cropping-heavy work. The Sony, though smaller sensor size-wise, comfortably outperforms in detail, dynamic range, and noise management - ideal for wildlife telephoto shots or low-light street scenes.
The Window to Your Frame: Viewing and Interface Experience
Shooting relies heavily on what you see through the viewfinder and on the LCD screen, dictating framing precision, focus confirmation, and user enjoyment.
The E-1 offers a traditional fixed 1.8” LCD with just 134k dots, quite modest even by 2003 standards, and an optical pentaprism viewfinder with 100% coverage and 0.48x magnification. It’s straightforward, reliable, and well-illuminated, perfect for bright daylight shooting but limiting for playback or live histogram checking.
The RX10 IV elevates the experience with a 3” articulating touchscreen boasting 1.44 million dots - ideal for critical focus adjustments, menu navigation, and low-angle or overhead shooting. The electronic viewfinder (EVF) at 2.36 million dots and 0.7x magnification offers a brighter, more informative preview than optical viewers, including real-time histogram overlays, focus peaking, and exposure previews.
If you treasure tactile optical clarity with no digital lag, the E-1’s viewfinder feels like home. However, the RX10 IV’s EVF and high-res LCD give you a more flexible and modern interface, a big plus if you’re into video or rely on live-view shooting.
Crafting the Image: Lens Ecosystem vs All-in-One Zoom
Lens choice can define a photographer’s creative horizon. The E-1’s Micro Four Thirds mount unlocks access to dozens of prime and zoom options, totaling around 45 lenses - a significant ecosystem that allows tailoring optics to niche needs, from ultra-fast portrait lenses to rugged macros. The crop factor of 2.1x makes focal lengths effectively longer (e.g., a 25mm lens behaves like ~52.5mm in 35mm terms), great for telephoto reach but requiring wider lenses for landscapes.
The Sony RX10 IV takes the opposite approach with a fixed 24-600mm f/2.4-4 lens offering 25x zoom. It’s remarkable - a bridge camera dream setup that removes lens-swapping complexity while delivering extraordinary zoom reach and versatility in one package. This lens features solid image stabilization, fast focus motors, and an impressive macro focusing distance of just 3cm. However, the downside is optical compromises typical of such a vast zoom range (some softness towards the tele-end) and maximum aperture varying from fairly bright to modest as the zoom extends.
In short: The Olympus setup suits photographers who adore prime lenses or specialty optics and demand distinct character per lens, while the Sony is a one-stop-shop for travel, wildlife, or street photographers looking for maximum flexibility without fuss.
Autofocus Titans: Old School Meets Modern AI-Era Finesse
Autofocus systems have undergone near-revolutionary changes over the last two decades. The Olympus E-1 opts for phase detection autofocus with 3 focus points, supporting single and continuous AF modes but no tracking or face detection.
On paper - and in practice - the E-1's AF feels dated: slower acquisition, less accuracy in low light, and no subject tracking. It still works fine for deliberate portrait or landscape use, especially in good lighting, but falls short for dynamics like sports or wildlife where speed and precision are critical.
Enter the RX10 IV’s hybrid AF with 315 focus points combining phase and contrast detection, live view AF, continuous autofocus tracking, face and eye detection (including animal eye AF) - features that drastically improve hit rates on moving subjects and under challenging conditions. Coupled with burst shooting up to 24 fps, the RX10 IV is a formidable sports, wildlife, or event camera.
From hands-on testing, the RX10’s AF system is silky smooth, quick-locking, and remarkably reliable - even tracking birds in flight or fast soccer moves. The Olympus system, noble though it is, can't keep pace here.
How Do They Perform Across Photography Genres?
Let's put these cameras through some practical paces.
Portrait Photography
Portrait artisans seek pleasing skin tones, natural bokeh, and sharp eye focus. The Olympus E-1’s CCD sensor renders warm colors with smooth gradations, plus the lens selection enables creamy backgrounds with fast primes (e.g., 50mm f/1.8). However, only 5MP resolution limits cropping and large prints, and autofocus can lag a bit focusing on eyes.
The RX10 IV, with its 20MP CMOS sensor and advanced face/eye AF, nails subject tracking and produces clean images even in tricky light. Bokeh quality is decent, especially wide-angle, though less creamy than DSLR primes due to smaller sensor size and fixed optics.
Portrait rating: E-1 for character, RX10 IV for speed and versatility.
Landscape Photography
Landscape shooters prioritize resolution, dynamic range, and weather sealing.
While the Olympus E-1 only offers 5MP, its optical quality and the Four Thirds crop work well with upgraded lens choices to deliver sharp, punchy landscapes. However, lack of in-body image stabilization means tripods are a must for long exposures.
The RX10 IV’s 20MP sensor provides detailed landscape files with impressive dynamic range, aided by optical image stabilization and weather sealing that lets you brave light rain. It also shoots 4:3, 3:2, and other aspect ratios for composition flexibility.
Landscape rating: RX10 IV for resolution and stabilization, E-1 for classic color depth.
Wildlife Photography
Wildlife demands fast autofocus, long telephoto reach, and fast burst rates.
The Olympus leverages lens ecosystem choices but is limited by slower 3fps max burst and lesser AF. Plus, 5MP limits cropping distant subjects.
The RX10 IV’s 600mm equivalent lens, 24fps burst, and tracking AF bring wild critters into sharp focus from afar, making it an excellent wildlife tool-short of a dedicated super-telezoom system.
Wildlife rating: RX10 IV outright winner.
Sports Photography
Here, AF tracking, burst speed, and low-light performance matter enormously.
Olympus struggles: 3fps burst and limited AF points don’t keep up with fast action.
Sony shoots a stunning 24fps burst with full AF/AE tracking, plus better ISO capabilities, ideal for indoor and outdoor sports.
Sports rating: RX10 IV handily outperforms.
Street Photography
Street shooters crave discretion, low light handling, and portability.
The Olympus E-1’s bulk and noisier shutter can draw attention but offers excellent image quality in good light.
The RX10 IV’s silent electronic shutter, superb AF, and zoom versatility make it adaptable for candid shots, though it’s heavier and less pocketable than prime-focused mirrorless.
Street rating: RX10 IV for ease and speed; E-1 for deliberate compositions.
Macro Photography
Detail lovers want tight focusing range and stabilization.
Olympus depends on compatible macro lenses, which can be excellent but require manual focus skill.
Sony’s 3cm macro and optical IS provide easy closeups, though maximum magnification is moderate.
Macro rating: Edge to Olympus for lens options; Sony for convenience.
Night and Astrophotography
This niche demands high ISO performance and long exposure reliability.
Olympus’s CCD struggles with noise above ISO 3200 and no live-view means awkward focusing in the dark.
Sony shines with ISO up to 12800 native (boosted to 25600), built-in stabilization, and live view aiding focus on stars.
Night rating: RX10 IV clearly preferred.
Video Capabilities
E-1 offers no video recording.
RX10 IV boasts 4K UHD video (up to 30p), HDMI out, microphone and headphone ports, with multiple codecs and steady stabilization.
Video rating: RX10 IV unquestionably superior.
Travel Photography
Travelers prize versatility and battery life.
The Olympus’s size and lens-swapping needs add baggage load and slower pace; battery life data is scarce but CCD systems often drain quicker.
The Sony packs extensive zoom, stabilization, onboard flash, Wi-Fi/Bluetooth, and a 400-shot battery life, making it a strong all-in-one travel solution.
Travel rating: RX10 IV favored for flexibility.
Professional Work and Workflow
The Olympus E-1 outputs 12-bit RAW files compatible with established workflows of its time, favoring those embedded in Olympus systems. Its build and weather sealing are pro-level.
Sony supports 14-bit RAW, advanced autofocus aids, tethering via Wi-Fi and USB, and a more extensive output for hybrid workflows including video.
Pro rating: Depends on the work - the E-1 for dedicated photographic workflows; RX10 IV for multimedia pros.
Reliability, Build Quality, and Weather Resistance
Both cameras feature weather resistance, but neither is fully waterproof or shockproof.
The Olympus is constructed like a tank, typical of professional DSLRs of its generation, plus environmental sealing adds confidence in challenging conditions.
Sony’s RX10 IV offers a sealed lens and robust body, impressive for a bridge model, making it reliable for varied outdoor conditions.
Battery and Storage: The Practicalities of Power and Memory
The Olympus uses Compact Flash cards (Type I or II), historically the standard for pro DSLRs.
Sony embraces modern SD and Memory Stick formats, more common, cheaper, and widely available.
Sony offers approximately 400 shots per battery charge; Olympus’s battery life figures are not provided, but CCD-powered DSLRs typically drain more rapidly than recent CMOS sensor cameras.
Connectivity and Sharing
In an era of instant sharing, the E-1 flies blind - no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS.
The RX10 IV includes built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC, full HDMI output, USB, and microphone/headphone ports, enabling smooth on-the-go work and remote control.
Price Reality Check: Value for Money?
Both cameras launch around $1700 new (E-1 at $1699.99, RX10 IV at $1698). Of course, the E-1 is a legacy model, now available only through the used market, while the RX10 IV remains a potent current option, sometimes discounted.
For the budget-conscious collector or nostalgic photographer, the E-1 offers an authentic DSLR experience but limited resolution and speed.
The Sony RX10 IV delivers modern features, impressive specs, and lens zoom convenience in one package for roughly the same outlay.
Overall Performance and Genre-Specific Scores
Let’s visualize performance summaries to give perspective on each camera’s strengths.
The RX10 IV comes out on top across most categories: autofocus, image quality, video, and shooting speed, while the Olympus E-1 scores respectably in color rendition and build.
Sample Image Gallery: Real-World Output
Time to look at how these cameras actually capture moments and details in the wild.
The E-1 images evoke the early digital era with classic tone and characteristic softness. The RX10 IV frames are sharper, more vibrant, and display superior dynamic range - an advantage when shooting complex scenes.
So, Which One Should You Choose?
To wrap up this epic face-off, your choice hinges largely on your photographic goals, style, and workflow preferences:
-
Choose the Olympus E-1 if:
- You’re a photography purist craving the tactile feel of a true DSLR.
- You have a collection of Four Thirds lenses or want to explore classic optics.
- You prioritize color fidelity and rugged build over resolution and speed.
- Your work involves studio, portrait, or landscape where speed and video matter less.
-
Choose the Sony RX10 IV if:
- You want a versatile, all-in-one camera for wildlife, sports, travel, and street photography.
- You demand lightning-fast autofocus, high burst rates, and advanced video.
- You appreciate modern ergonomics, touchscreen, live view, and wireless features.
- You need solid ISO performance for low light and night shooting.
Final Thoughts
Comparing the Olympus E-1 to the Sony RX10 IV is like contrasting a vintage analog watch with a high-tech smartwatch. Both are marvels, but designed for different times and needs. The E-1 serves as a reminder of foundational DSLR craftsmanship - quiet, deliberate, and focused on still image quality in demanding conditions. The RX10 IV exemplifies how camera technology embraces speed, connectivity, and crossover multimedia roles accessible to enthusiasts and pros alike.
So, whether you find joy in the classic mirror and CCD realm or thrive in the modern BSI-CMOS, 24fps shooting world, there's a rewarding experience waiting for you. And, hey, if you’re like me, you might just want to keep both around - to enjoy the best of all photographic eras.
Happy shooting!
Olympus E-1 vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
Type | Pro DSLR | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2003-11-29 | 2017-09-12 |
Body design | Large SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 315 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 24.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 735g (1.62 lb) | 1095g (2.41 lb) |
Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $1,698 |