Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Replacement is Olympus SP-810 UZ
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SP-800 UZ, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are sold by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is pretty close but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M10 II was unveiled 5 years later than the SP-800 UZ and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M10 II scores against the SP-800 UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus SP-800 UZ. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-M10 II | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | February 2010 | Fresher by 68 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-M10 II
SP-800 UZ | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-M10 II | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II offers exterior measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus SP-800 UZ has sizing of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") having a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus SP-800 UZ in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II vs the SP-800 UZ.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and SP-800 UZ is 82 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing purely by researching technical specs. The photograph underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and SP-800 UZ.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will render more detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 1000 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 12 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lbs) | 455g (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $499 | $270 |