Olympus E-1 vs Sony S2000
59 Imaging
37 Features
36 Overall
36
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus E-1 vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Released November 2003
- Updated by Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Launched January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-1 vs Sony S2000 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-1 vs Sony S2000, former is a Pro DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and S2000 (10MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and S2000 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-1 was unveiled 7 years before the S2000 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Sony S2000 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-1 scores against the S2000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-1 vs Sony S2000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Sony S2000
| E-1 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus E-1
| S2000 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2010 | November 2003 | More modern by 74 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Crisper display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Sony S2000
| E-1 | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus E-1 vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-1 comes with outer measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") having a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Sony S2000 has measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-1 vs Sony S2000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-1 versus the S2000.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-1 and S2000 is 59 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to see the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at technical specs. The image underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-1 and S2000.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-1 using its larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Sony S2000 will give extra detail having an extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The more aged E-1 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-1 vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-1 vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus E-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Class | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2003-11-29 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Large SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 134k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1200s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.30 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 735g (1.62 lbs) | 167g (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $1,700 | $225 |