Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX100V
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37


95 Imaging
38 Features
40 Overall
38
Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX100V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Revealed November 2003
- Refreshed by Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 147g - 97 x 59 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2011

Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX100V Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Olympus E-1 versus Sony TX100V, one is a Pro DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and TX100V (16MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and TX100V (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.

The E-1 was unveiled 8 years before the TX100V which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Sony TX100V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-1 grades versus the TX100V with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX100V Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-1 Gallery and Sony TX100V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Sony TX100V
E-1 | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX100V over the Olympus E-1
TX100V | E-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | ![]() | November 2003 | More modern by 86 months |
Display size | 3.5" | ![]() | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.7") |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 134k | Crisper display (+1095k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Sony TX100V
E-1 | TX100V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX100V Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-1 offers outer measurements of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") and a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) while the Sony TX100V has proportions of 97mm x 59mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-1 versus Sony TX100V in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-1 and the TX100V.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-1 and TX100V is 59 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX100V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to see the difference between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The pic here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-1 and TX100V.
As you can tell, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-1 having a larger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Sony TX100V will resolve extra detail having an extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-1 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX100V Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-1 vs Sony TX100V Specifications
Olympus E-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX100V |
Category | Pro DSLR | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2003-11-29 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Large SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 5MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
Total lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 1.8 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | - | XtraFine OLED display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 735 grams (1.62 lb) | 147 grams (0.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 97 x 59 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $1,700 | $380 |