Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-1
- Updated by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-3 and Olympus FE-4030, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and FE-4030 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and FE-4030 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-3 was manufactured 22 months prior to the FE-4030 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-3 grades versus the FE-4030 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 & Olympus FE-4030. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus FE-4030 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus FE-4030
| E-3 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus E-3
| FE-4030 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 | February 2008 | More modern by 22 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus FE-4030
| E-3 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 has outside dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-4030 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-3 and Olympus FE-4030 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-3 against the FE-4030.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and FE-4030 is 56 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and FE-4030.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-3 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus FE-4030 will provide greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Olympus FE-4030 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-3 | Olympus FE-4030 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 4cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lbs) | 146 gr (0.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $670 | $130 |