Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Older Model is Olympus E-1
- Updated by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-3 and Olympus FE-4030, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and FE-4030 (14MP) and the E-3 (Four Thirds) and FE-4030 (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-3 was manufactured 22 months prior to the FE-4030 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus FE-4030 being a Compact camera.
Before delving into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-3 grades versus the FE-4030 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 & Olympus FE-4030. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus FE-4030 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus FE-4030
| E-3 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Olympus E-3
| FE-4030 | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 | February 2008 | More modern by 22 months | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus FE-4030
| E-3 | FE-4030 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 has outside dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") with a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-4030 has sizing of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-3 and Olympus FE-4030 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-3 against the FE-4030.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-3 and FE-4030 is 56 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes simply by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and FE-4030.
As you can tell, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-3 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus FE-4030 will provide greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus FE-4030 Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Olympus FE-4030 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-3 | Olympus FE-4030 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2010-01-07 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 4cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 890 gr (1.96 lbs) | 146 gr (0.32 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 571 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $670 | $130 |