Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M1 II
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Launched February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M1 III
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Following is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M1 II, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-3 was unveiled 9 years earlier than the E-M1 II which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-3 grades vs the E-M1 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-3 & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| E-3 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus E-3
| E-M1 II | E-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2016 | February 2008 | More modern by 104 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer screen (+807k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus E-M1 II
| E-3 | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen | |
| Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 enjoys outer dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M1 II has proportions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
See the Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M1 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-3 compared to the E-M1 II.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and E-M1 II is 56 and 68 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing a spec sheet. The picture underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-3 and E-M1 II.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Olympus E-M1 II to render extra detail having an extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-3 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
| Olympus E-3 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus E-3 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Pro Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2008-02-20 | 2016-09-19 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VIII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 13.00 m | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | None | 4096x2160 |
| Video file format | - | MOV, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 890 grams (1.96 lbs) | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 56 | 80 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.6 | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | 571 | 1312 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
| Storage slots | Single | Two |
| Cost at launch | $670 | $1,700 |