Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Succeeded the Olympus E-1
- Successor is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
Following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-3 and Olympus E-M10 II, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both created by Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-3 (10MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-3 was manufactured 8 years before the E-M10 II which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-3 grades versus the E-M10 II when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-3 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus E-M10 II
E-3 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus E-3
E-M10 II | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | ![]() | February 2008 | More modern by 91 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus E-M10 II
E-3 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 enjoys physical dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-M10 II has proportions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-3 and Olympus E-M10 II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the E-3 vs the E-M10 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5486/c54861ef2f004956da50963114c224fb382a2507" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and E-M10 II is 56 and 82 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f228/3f2285cae5c7c99fe0e8919cff8756801fb895d8" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The image below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and E-M10 II.
As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus E-M10 II to give you extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged E-3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96049/960494d70da7c2dc9d63767e3344055a7c5a859b" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a607/1a607394023f39441f74048a7d40033c8a95dabb" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2015-08-25 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 45 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 lb) | 390g (0.86 lb) |
Dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | 571 | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $670 | $499 |