Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1838c/1838cdf26d1a273bfc0958872d51c3945bf812d1" alt="Olympus E-3 front Olympus E-3 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Introduced February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- Later Model is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2 Overview
Here is a complete review of the Olympus E-3 and Olympus E-PL2, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and they are both offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the E-PL2 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-3 was announced 4 years prior to the E-PL2 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-3 matches up vs the E-PL2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-3 and Olympus PEN E-PL2. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-3 Gallery and Olympus E-PL2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Olympus E-PL2
E-3 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus E-3
E-PL2 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2011 | ![]() | February 2008 | Fresher by 36 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Olympus E-PL2
E-3 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-3 offers physical measurements of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL2 has sizing of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-3 and Olympus E-PL2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-3 against the E-PL2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70457/7045702029a5d61fc9f20ea335bf0460591951fd" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-3 and E-PL2 is 56 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92e9b/92e9b2c811aeadf850dd26e5beca6a14a5d110a1" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing simply by researching technical specs. The visual underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-3 and E-PL2.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus E-PL2 to result in more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The older E-3 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbe50/dbe501abbaa497a02d732f0b3b5d8b75c2d644d8" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc8d2/fc8d2ea51a71804e52ed76fd8f2497867b2111f0" alt="Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-3 vs Olympus E-PL2 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Olympus PEN E-PL2 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2008-02-20 | 2011-02-11 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 45 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 lbs) | 362g (0.80 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | 55 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | 10.2 |
DXO Low light score | 571 | 573 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 280 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $670 | $0 |